Re: image map trashes image

1999-11-23 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 07:39:22AM +, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rather than a missing feature, I wonder if all these tile-level probs > are one thing or many??? The one who finds out should be forced to fix it ;) Maybe we can find this before 1.2. And when these problems go away

Re: image map trashes image

1999-11-22 Thread Nick Lamb
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 04:28:48AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > It often ends up with gimp spinning in an endless loop or a segfault or > corrupted images (including undo). Eeek! This is definitely something wrong in the current implementation rather than a missing feature, I wonder if all these

Re: image map trashes image

1999-11-22 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 06:45:15PM +, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > one oepration (regardless of which) is being done at the same time. It gets > > much worse when you do it on the same image. > > Are these "bad things" fatal? It often ends up with gimp spinning in an endless loop

Re: image map trashes image

1999-11-22 Thread Nick Lamb
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 02:49:50PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > In current gimp you will notice lot's of bnad things happening when more then > one oepration (regardless of which) is being done at the same time. It gets > much worse when you do it on the same image. Are these "bad things" fatal?

Re: image map trashes image

1999-11-22 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Image map modifies the image in place and it's possible to do another > operation while an image map tool dialog (e.g. threshold) is active. In current gimp you will notice lot's of bnad things happening when