Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
Sorry I sent this erroneusly off-list but... PPS: ... thinking about it maybe that is symply missig a: make clean before the make html-XX ? On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:07:23PM +1000, Roman Joost wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:20:32PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > BTW the page states: > > > > >Work in Progress - GIMP 2.8 > > > > Is it really a wip? > Yes. It links to the HTML I automatically build every night from git > HEAD. > > > I see the same (excluding html compilation > > errors...) page in two weeks (from the release of 2.8.0 manual help > > version...) > Hm... what do you mean by same page? Example: This is old 2.8.0, _not_ HEAD, really... http://docs.gimp.org/2.8/it/gimp-introduction-whats-new.html This is just the same: http://docs.gimp.org/it/gimp-introduction-whats-new.html This is my updated HTML compilation (non daily updated but surely newer than the above...) http://gimp.linux.it/www/manual/gimp-help-2/html/it/gimp-introduction-whats-new.html see the screenshots for example... PS: I am really sorry to be always me that make troubles but ... since noone noticed it... -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:20:32PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > BTW the page states: > > >Work in Progress - GIMP 2.8 > > Is it really a wip? Yes. It links to the HTML I automatically build every night from git HEAD. > I see the same (excluding html compilation > errors...) page in two weeks (from the release of 2.8.0 manual help > version...) Hm... what do you mean by same page? Cheers, -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanof...@gimp.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:08:55PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:25:56PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > On 13.06.2012 14:39, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > > > >PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read > > >as: > > > > > >docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html > > > > Do you really want to have the major, minor and micro version in there? > > ? We already have! What do you call 2.6.1 or 2.8.1 ??? BTW the page states: >Work in Progress - GIMP 2.8 > >Note > >Please note that some of these files are work in progress. They're >subject to change and may not be of any use because of errors. We >apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Is it really a wip? I see the same (excluding html compilation errors...) page in two weeks (from the release of 2.8.0 manual help version...) PS: I apologise for all this mailing noise but I'm at home on holidays ... ;-))) -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:25:56PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote: > On 13.06.2012 14:39, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > >PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read as: > > > >docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html > > Do you really want to have the major, minor and micro version in there? ? We already have! What do you call 2.6.1 or 2.8.1 ??? -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > On 13.06.2012 14:39, Marco Ciampa wrote: > >> PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read >> as: >> >> docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html > > Do you really want to have the major, minor and micro version in there? Also, one would have to write .htaccess rules for 301 redirects. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
On 13.06.2012 14:39, Marco Ciampa wrote: PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read as: docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html Do you really want to have the major, minor and micro version in there? Regards, Michael ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] web page organization proposal
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > I think that the gimp doc web page is a bit misleading. > > I think that the pages should be arranged in this way: > > docs.gimp.org/xx/v.v.v/index.html > ^^ ^ > language version > code code > > and the always developing code trunk should be published in this way: > > docs.gimp.org/xx/index.html > > In this way we could easily compare the different versions and make the > online user always use the most updated version. > > So the "Work in progress" HTML link anchors should point in the latter > form and not (as it is now) to a specific version (2.8). > > This is a kind of "RFC" :-) please say what you think about it. > PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read as: docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
