Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
Hi Ulf,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:09:15PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote:
> Roman Joost (Tuesday, 15. June 2010)
> > because the question of a new gimp-help release came up and the
> > last release is quite a few months back, how about preparing for a
> > new release? According to the changelog a lot has changed, now
> > I'm wondering if there are still a few things missing which
> > contributors want to see in a new release.
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599700 ("Misleading Info in
> INSTALL text") should be fixed for the next release.
I've scheduled this for the next milestone.
I won't have any time this week to work on a release, but can do next
week.
Cheers,
--
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanof...@gimp.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:03 +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > Is the current state in git still targetting GIMP 2.6? Just making > > sure... > > > > It seems not looking at this page: > > http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/gimp-concepts-script-fu.html > > in particular this is totally wrong (obsolete) text & screenshots > > http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/kinds-of-script-fu.html > > IMHO this should be updated _before_ a release, _or_ it should be > clearly written (README?) that some sections still refers to GIMP older > versions. Well, this is already the case with the 2.6.0 gimp-help release, so doing another release now wouldn't make it worse. Sven ___ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:09 +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote: > Sven Neumann (Tuesday, 15. June 2010) > > Is the current state in git still targetting GIMP 2.6? Just making > > sure... > > Yes (although some docs and screenshots are not up-to-date). > > BTW, do you think it makes sense to start writing docs for > GIMP-2.7/2.8? I don't think so. There will be more user-interface changes, so you might waste time if you document the current state. Sven ___ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
Sven Neumann (Tuesday, 15. June 2010) > Is the current state in git still targetting GIMP 2.6? Just making > sure... Yes (although some docs and screenshots are not up-to-date). BTW, do you think it makes sense to start writing docs for GIMP-2.7/2.8? Ulf signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
Roman Joost (Tuesday, 15. June 2010)
> because the question of a new gimp-help release came up and the
> last release is quite a few months back, how about preparing for a
> new release? According to the changelog a lot has changed, now
> I'm wondering if there are still a few things missing which
> contributors want to see in a new release.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599700 ("Misleading Info in
INSTALL text") should be fixed for the next release.
Ulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55:31PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Roman Joost wrote: > > > because the question of a new gimp-help release came up and the last > > release is quite a few months back, how about preparing for a new > > release? According to the changelog a lot has changed, now I'm > > wondering if there are still a few things missing which contributors > > want to see in a new release. > > Is the current state in git still targetting GIMP 2.6? Just making > sure... > It seems not looking at this page: http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/gimp-concepts-script-fu.html in particular this is totally wrong (obsolete) text & screenshots http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/kinds-of-script-fu.html IMHO this should be updated _before_ a release, _or_ it should be clearly written (README?) that some sections still refers to GIMP older versions. -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
Re: [Gimp-docs] Help release
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Roman Joost wrote: > because the question of a new gimp-help release came up and the last > release is quite a few months back, how about preparing for a new > release? According to the changelog a lot has changed, now I'm > wondering if there are still a few things missing which contributors > want to see in a new release. Is the current state in git still targetting GIMP 2.6? Just making sure... Sven ___ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
