Daniel Rogers wrote:
So, I noticed the resounding silence surrounding this thread. Is anyone
still interested in a foundation? I went into this foundation thing
thinking I had support from the community. I cannot do this all by
myself. The Foundation is about getting involved. If noone
Here is an example of other OS project foundation, which works. Just to
know.
http://firebird.sourceforge.net/ff/foundation/
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hello,
First of all I'd like to thank Daniel for putting a lot of work into
investigating what needs to be done in order to launch The GIMP
Hello,
First of all I'd like to thank Daniel for putting a lot of work into
investigating what needs to be done in order to launch The GIMP
Foundation.
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 15:58, Daniel Rogers wrote:
THINGS TO BE DECIDED
[snip]
1. Will TGF have members? I am talking about members with
Hi all,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Also, so far the FSF
has done a great job at funding our developer conferences. So we
should really have good reasons to form our own foundation since I
don't expect the FSF to grant any more fundings as soon as The GIMP
Foundation has been created. This is not a vote
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
Is this required to be in person, or is conference call/irc/email/etc
sufficient? Furthermore, is it possible for board members to be
reimbursed for expenses? I can see this being a major obstacle for non-us
residents otherwise.
Kelly already answered the first part,
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my mind one of the major reasons to have a Gimp Foundation is to put
all of our IP ducks in a row. As I've said before I don't think that
having contributors sign over copyright to TGF would be the best plan.
Instead, I would like to see
Also,
I fear my first email may have been a bit to rambling to be able to actually get my point
across.
What I am hoping to discover by encourging this conversation is what ways people would
like to help with TGF and in what ways people would like to see TGF help them.
I would also like to
