Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good.
In the past, CRT monitors were considered better because the displayed
gamut was wider, the color consistency (same color in different areas)
was better and greater resolutions were offered when
Gilles Maltais writes:
In the past, CRT monitors were considered better because the displayed
gamut was wider, the color consistency (same color in different areas)
was better and greater resolutions were offered when compared to LCDs.
For basic low-end displays (the ones you see on
Hi!
I not tested today's best LCD monitors... but while there are
differences in colors while you move your head before an LCD monitor,
the CRT monitor is better for professional use!
Anti
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 09:41 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
Gilles Maltais writes:
In the past, CRT monitors
On 3/18/06, Gracia M. Littauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good.The Shootsmarter site has a decent article on comparing CRTs to LCDs.
http://www.shootsmarter.com/infocenter/wc041.html
___
Gimp-user
which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good.
--
Gracia...Cooleemee, NC Registered Linux user #263390 - SuSE 10 Pro
My country, right or wrong. If right, to be kept right, if wrong, to be
put right.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
On Saturday 18 March 2006 16:44, Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good.
Even among crt monitors there are different levels of capability.
I bought used on ebay a Sony CPD-G520 which has color temperature
settings etc. New this class of monitor
