Helen writes:
I have a photo of a dark red flower against a dark background.
I've tried tedious ways to lighten the background without changing the
flower,
but the details of the flower are too tiny. So I'm browsing tutorials.
Should I
be learning about masks? About layers? A hint how I can
Akkana Peck wrote:
Helen writes:
I have a photo of a dark red flower against a dark background.
I've tried tedious ways to lighten the background without changing the
flower,
but the details of the flower are too tiny. So I'm browsing tutorials.
Should I
be learning about masks? About layers? A
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:04:15PM -0500, Eric P wrote:
I agree with everything here except I'd use a mask instead of a
selection. A selection can be a bit too fleeting for a something as
tedious as your task.
it is really an advantage that the people who used gimp-1.0 have over
newer
I agree with everything here except I'd use a mask instead of a
selection. A selection can be a bit too fleeting for a something as
tedious as your task.
Eric
tedious = I probably should have used detailed. I didn't realize
how that came off...
Eric
I have a photo of a dark red flower against a dark background.
I've tried tedious ways to lighten the background without changing the flower,
but the details of the flower are too tiny. So I'm browsing tutorials. Should I
be learning about masks? About layers? A hint how I can approach this?
