On Wednesday 03 October 2007 04:35:36 David Southwell wrote:
IMHO photoshop is NOT a tool designed for the average user.
Average can mean typical it can mean numbers (as in
mean/mode/median), either way, PS fits the bill.
So if you want to struggle with an average creativity ceiling
suffer
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 23:11:19 Leon Brooks GIMP wrote:
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 04:35:36 David Southwell wrote:
IMHO photoshop is NOT a tool designed for the average user.
Average can mean typical it can mean numbers (as in
mean/mode/median), either way, PS fits the bill.
You are
i already knew about Groking the Gimp and have read parts of it. However, I
also have a digital version of Sam's Guide to GIMP in 24 Hours which is
easier to read so I shifted over to that first. I did not know about your
other leads so have bookmarked them all so I can return for tutorials when
bit processing is now such a huge email that I am having trouble telling
when I want to read it and when I don't. There is some really good creative
info coming in on it which I don't want to miss. But there is also some
sort of continuing feud going on under that same heading, which I do not
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 11:58:47 Greg wrote:
--- Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you need to abandon the jpeg format as it is lossey (google for
it) and you need to shoot RAW.
I know, but if you can retain your original bit-depth, the lossyness
isn't as noticeable,
On 10/3/07, gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[lots of stuff]
David,
I've read all your posts. Carol has shared some of her art images with us
so I know what she's after, and although this isn't directly relevant to
GIMP, can you point us towards a website with some of your images? I
