Chris,
On 2010-06-25 02:54, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Philip Rhoadesp...@pricom.com.au wrote:
Confirmation of what is going on from the gurus would be appreciated!
It was as I guessed - the scans are in grayscale mode but the contents
are essentially a 1-bit
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au wrote:
OK, so now the next question is: If the original is recognised by
identify as a 1 bit per pixel image, why doesn't Gimp keep it that way
when opening the file? At 300dpi there is no real issue with jaggy
edges - is it
Branko,
On 2010-06-26 00:54, Branko Vukelic wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Philip Rhoadesp...@pricom.com.au wrote:
OK, so now the next question is: If the original is recognised by
identify as a 1 bit per pixel image, why doesn't Gimp keep it that way
when opening the file? At
