> From: Martin Nordholts
>To me, keeping the CMYK profile around and writing it to an RGB jpeg
>does not make sense;
In similar cases make even less sense.
The original was cropped so that was a tiny snippet of a large tif.
why a almost microscopic crop should conserve more then 500kb of ICC
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 21:11:51 +0200 (CEST)
"photocomix" wrote:
>
> >> > To see the size of the attached color profile, first extract it:
> >> >
> >> >$ exiftool -icc_profile -b -w icc lightbulb.jpg
> >> >
> >> > Then look at how big it (and the image) is:
> >> >
> >> >$ du -hb lightbulb.*
On 08/01/2009 09:11 PM, photocomix wrote:
> @ David
> Perhaps it should also mention the size of the profile
> will be nice,as will be useful a option a option to discard it.(as Exif data
> that occupy much less space may be discarded)..i mean a option from the "Save"
> (or if you prefer the term
>> > To see the size of the attached color profile, first extract it:
>> >
>> >$ exiftool -icc_profile -b -w icc lightbulb.jpg
>> >
>> > Then look at how big it (and the image) is:
>> >
>> >$ du -hb lightbulb.*
>> >
>> > which gives the output
>> >
>> >557168 lightbulb.icc
>> >560
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
> On 08/01/2009 08:37 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > On 08/01/2009 01:05 PM, photocomix wrote:
> >> i never noticed a similar bug, even if i used Gimp to save as copy
> thousands
> >> of jpeg, and i would never believed this possible, but i ha
On 08/01/2009 08:37 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 08/01/2009 01:05 PM, photocomix wrote:
>> i never noticed a similar bug, even if i used Gimp to save as copy
>> thousands
>> of jpeg, and i would never believed this possible, but i have to face
>> evidence
>>
>> to the point image dimensions
On 08/01/2009 01:05 PM, photocomix wrote:
> i never noticed a similar bug, even if i used Gimp to save as copy
> thousands
> of jpeg, and i would never believed this possible, but i have to face
> evidence
>
> to the point image dimensions: 90x116 Size: 547KB
>
> And what is really weird is tha
i never noticed a similar bug, even if i used Gimp to save as copy thousands
of jpeg, and i would never believed this possible, but i have to face
evidence
to the point image dimensions: 90x116 Size: 547KB
And what is really weird is that seems impossible , re-saving from gimp as
jpg reduce th
