Re: [Gimp-user] extracting help files

2012-08-24 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Chuck Gee wrote: > Hi: > > I am very much a novice at this and am completely baffled as to how/where I > am supposed to extract gimp-help-2.8.0.tar.bz2 file. It's because you are not supposed to do that :) > If I can't get this to work, I would be satisfied with a

[Gimp-user] extracting help files

2012-08-24 Thread Chuck Gee
Hi: I am very much a novice at this and am completely baffled as to how/where I am supposed to extract gimp-help-2.8.0.tar.bz2 file. If I can't get this to work, I would be satisfied with a pdf of the 2.8 help files! Just anything, because I cannot always work connected to the internet. My oper

Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?

2012-08-24 Thread Richard Gitschlag
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:40:47 +0200 > From: si...@budig.de > To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated? > > Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote: > > Okay, then what purpose does the "Save a copy" command do these days > > when

[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8.2 Windows 64-bit

2012-08-24 Thread swordfish1945
I get file-tiff-save.exe & file-tiff-load.exe Application Error when opening Gimp 2.8.2 in windows 7 64-bit. The error: The application was unable to start correctly (0xc07b). Any fix for this? -- swordfish1945 (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-li

Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?

2012-08-24 Thread Rob Antonishen
>> Adding this shortcut would train users to use a workflow with an >> artificial stumbling block inbetween > > Okay, then what purpose does the "Save a copy" command do these days when > from the user's perspective the ONLY difference between it and "Export" is > the target file format? I sug

Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?

2012-08-24 Thread Simon Budig
Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote: > Okay, then what purpose does the "Save a copy" command do these days > when from the user's perspective the ONLY difference between it and > "Export" is the target file format? I suggested it once that the > former should now be treated as a v