On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Denzo wrote:
> >
> In the photo I was working on the photo was so poor in places that I
> couldn't
> actually see much detail - so not a lot to lose.
There's more than you might think, especially if you can scan at 16
bits per channel (16 bit grey or 48
Hmm.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Denzo wrote:
>>Sending questions to notifications@ is not necessary. :/
I said that, and now I go take a look at gimpusers.com, and I can't tell what
notificati...@gimpusers.com means. It may be an address that the
gimpusers.com forum
On 11/22/2016 05:02 PM, rpdayton wrote:
> Not sure if I should post this as a bug, thought I'd check here to
> see if maybe there is just a setting somewhere buried in a menu that
> I should change. I tried GIMP several years ago as a TIF
> viewer/handler, but it could never print tif files
On 11/22/2016 09:07 PM, jyvaut75 wrote:
> What should I do with the error in the attached file?
You should tell us the steps to reproduce the error.
--
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
___
gimp-user-list
Hi,
What should I do with the error in the attached file?
Thank you for the help,
Regards,
JY
Attachments:
* http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/339/original/TMP.JPG
--
jyvaut75 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing
>Sending questions to notifications@ is not necessary. :/
>
>About your question, I'll offer my opinion.
>Doubly emphasize that.
>This is something that many people do not understand.
>
>Every edit you make to an image removes or alters some of the original
>information in the image. That means
Not sure if I should post this as a bug, thought I'd check here to see if maybe
there is just a setting somewhere buried in a menu that I should change.
I tried GIMP several years ago as a TIF viewer/handler, but it could never print
tif files without critically crashing gimp. A few discussions