[Gimp-user] I cannot support 2.8

2013-08-13 Thread M_Leverette
Developers of GIMP, I realize that the GIMP is written by programmers and not photographers or artists. I can no longer see financially supporting the GIMP beyond 2.6 due to the poor decisions made in 2.8. I much prefer to use GIMP over PS and other commercial software I have at my disposal. It

Re: [Gimp-user] I cannot support 2.8

2013-08-13 Thread ajtiM
I am GIMP user from time when GIMP came out and I was all the time Unix user. For me is GIMP 2.8 better than 2.6 and I believe that Photoshop is written by programmers too… On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:01 PM, M_Leverette for...@gimpusers.com wrote: Developers of GIMP, I realize that the GIMP is

Re: [Gimp-user] I cannot support 2.8

2013-08-13 Thread maderios
On 08/13/2013 07:20 PM, ajtiM wrote: I am GIMP user from time when GIMP came out and I was all the time Unix user. For me is GIMP 2.8 better than 2.6 and I believe that Photoshop is written by programmers too… Hi 1) Yes photoshop is written by programmers too but these programmers are

Re: [Gimp-user] I cannot support 2.8

2013-08-13 Thread Kevin Payne
But the developers of GIMP will have to do it without my funding until they get back on the right track. Until then, I will be waiting. Sincerely, Marc -- M_Leverette (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) Dear Developers, In response to the above, I've made a donation. Keep up the

Re: [Gimp-user] I cannot support 2.8

2013-08-13 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Payne wrote: But the developers of GIMP will have to do it without my funding until they get back on the right track. Until then, I will be waiting. Sincerely, Marc -- M_Leverette (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) Dear Developers, In response