Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread Bgs
Hi, On 10/19/2012 10:29 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: so if one would allocate a target memory area in RAM first and then fill the mem map with the to-be-saved data one could open a file handle right from the start and copy the mem portions to disk as they get filled by the compression algo. The

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:50 +0200, Dexter Filmore wrote: > Am Thursday 18 October 2012 21:05:35 schrieb Jernej Simončič: > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: > > > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. > > > > If you're talking about saving a f

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread Dexter Filmore
Am Thursday 18 October 2012 21:05:35 schrieb Jernej Simončič: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: > > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. > > If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done - > saving isn't something t

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread maderios
On 10/18/2012 09:05 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done - saving isn't something that can be paralleliz

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done - saving isn't something that can be parallelized. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eter

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread maderios
On 10/18/2012 07:10 PM, scl wrote: Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, maderios wrote: Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ? Not in the stable version, sorry. What about the 'Number of processors' option in the Preferences/Environment dialog? Preferences/Envir

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread scl
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, maderios wrote: Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ? Not in the stable version, sorry. What about the 'Number of processors' option in the Preferences/Environment dialog? Kind regards, Sven

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread maderios
On 10/18/2012 01:55 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, maderios wrote: Not in the stable version, sorry. May be in the future ? Sure :) Thanks. So we wait... Regards -- Maderios "Art is meant to disturb. Science reassures." "L'art est fait pour troubler. La

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, maderios wrote: >> Not in the stable version, sorry. > > May be in the future ? Sure :) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, maderios wrote: > Hi > When saving png image (ex 4496 × 3000 pixels) Gimp is very slow. > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. > Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ? Not in the stable version, sorry. Alexandre Prokoudine

[Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-18 Thread maderios
Hi When saving png image (ex 4496 × 3000 pixels) Gimp is very slow. I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ? Best regards -- Maderios "Art is meant to disturb. Science reassures." "L'art est fait pour troubler. La scienc