Hi,
On 10/19/2012 10:29 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
so if one would allocate a target memory area in RAM first and then fill the
mem map with the to-be-saved data one could open a file handle right from the
start and copy the mem portions to disk as they get filled by the compression
algo.
The
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:50 +0200, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Am Thursday 18 October 2012 21:05:35 schrieb Jernej Simončič:
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote:
> > > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image.
> >
> > If you're talking about saving a f
Am Thursday 18 October 2012 21:05:35 schrieb Jernej Simončič:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote:
> > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image.
>
> If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done -
> saving isn't something t
On 10/18/2012 09:05 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote:
I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image.
If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done -
saving isn't something that can be paralleliz
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote:
> I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image.
If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done -
saving isn't something that can be parallelized.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eter
On 10/18/2012 07:10 PM, scl wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, maderios wrote:
Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ?
Not in the stable version, sorry.
What about the 'Number of processors' option in the
Preferences/Environment dialog?
Preferences/Envir
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, maderios wrote:
Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ?
Not in the stable version, sorry.
What about the 'Number of processors' option in the
Preferences/Environment dialog?
Kind regards,
Sven
On 10/18/2012 01:55 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, maderios wrote:
Not in the stable version, sorry.
May be in the future ?
Sure :)
Thanks. So we wait...
Regards
--
Maderios
"Art is meant to disturb. Science reassures."
"L'art est fait pour troubler. La
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, maderios wrote:
>> Not in the stable version, sorry.
>
> May be in the future ?
Sure :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, maderios wrote:
> Hi
> When saving png image (ex 4496 × 3000 pixels) Gimp is very slow.
> I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image.
> Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ?
Not in the stable version, sorry.
Alexandre Prokoudine
Hi
When saving png image (ex 4496 × 3000 pixels) Gimp is very slow.
I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image.
Any solution about a multi-threaded Gimp ?
Best regards
--
Maderios
"Art is meant to disturb. Science reassures."
"L'art est fait pour troubler. La scienc
11 matches
Mail list logo