Re: [Gimp-user] How to reduce image file size while retaining width/height of image?

2015-07-11 Thread Ofnuts

On 11/07/15 00:17, Steve Kinney wrote:

Depending on the image content, GIF files may be noticeably larger
or smaller than equivalent JPG files.  PNG files will usually be
substantially larger than either.


For screenshots(*) and lost CGI, PNG is usually significantly smaller 
than either GIF or JPEG. And you cannot reduce the quality too much on 
JPEGs for images with hard edges such as screenshots.


(*) unless of course the screenshot contains a photo...
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] How to reduce image file size while retaining width/height of image?

2015-07-11 Thread Akkana Peck
Ofnuts writes:
 On 11/07/15 00:17, Steve Kinney wrote:
 Depending on the image content, GIF files may be noticeably larger
 or smaller than equivalent JPG files.  PNG files will usually be
 substantially larger than either.
 
 For screenshots(*) and lost CGI, PNG is usually significantly smaller than
 either GIF or JPEG. And you cannot reduce the quality too much on JPEGs for
 images with hard edges such as screenshots.
 
 (*) unless of course the screenshot contains a photo...

I recommend everyone test this out for themselves. I find my
screenshots are usually much larger in PNG, but it depends on what
sorts of windows you shoot. In my case it's usually browser or GIMP
windows.

Of course, if you need to edit the screenshot before passing it on
(e.g. adding arrows or annotations) then PNG is better since it's
non-lossy.

...Akkana
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list