Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread Bgs
Hi, On 10/19/2012 10:29 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: so if one would allocate a target memory area in RAM first and then fill the mem map with the to-be-saved data one could open a file handle right from the start and copy the mem portions to disk as they get filled by the compression algo. The

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:50 +0200, Dexter Filmore wrote: > Am Thursday 18 October 2012 21:05:35 schrieb Jernej Simončič: > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: > > > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. > > > > If you're talking about saving a f

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread Dexter Filmore
Am Thursday 18 October 2012 21:05:35 schrieb Jernej Simončič: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: > > I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. > > If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done - > saving isn't something t

Re: [Gimp-user] multi-threaded Gimp

2012-10-19 Thread maderios
On 10/18/2012 09:05 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0200, maderios wrote: I have a Core I7 with 8 cpu. I noticed Gimp use only 1 cpu to save image. If you're talking about saving a file, there's not much that can be done - saving isn't something that can be paralleliz