On 2018-08-15 15:14, nickib wrote:
> Wow - the revision you created is beautiful! Honestly I don’t understand most
> of your explanation but the end product would be perfect! Bottom line - how
> large - realistically- could that be made and still look good?
With my version, *as is*, I wouldn't
>The more I look at the "lightroom version", the less I like it. For
>me,
>the orange is oversaturated; I preferred the softer, more "pastel"
>look
>of the original. Also, the dock is so dark in the original that trying
>to recover any detail there doesn't look particularly good to my eye,
On 2018-08-13 15:01, nickib wrote:
>> You might be going about this all wrong. If you really want to use
>> this to produce a very large physical print, I would consider
>> embracing that the original image is smudgy by upsampling it (maybe
>> to 7200x3600 if not 14400x7200 after cropping it to
On 2018-08-13 15:43, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 08/13/18 20:31, Matthew Woehlke via gimp-user-list wrote:
>> Also, make sure you save the result at least as a JPEG with 98% to 100%
>> quality, if not PNG.
>
> I second the idea to hide the defects with some heavy "artistic"
> filtering, but 98% quality?
>I'm not sure I'd go even that big. The original was twice that
>resolution and had a lot less JPEG artifacting.
>
>Actually... you might be going about this all wrong. If you really
>want
>to use this to produce a very large physical print, I would consider
>embracing that the original image is
>I'm not sure I'd go even that big. The original was twice that
>resolution and had a lot less JPEG artifacting.
>
>Actually... you might be going about this all wrong. If you really
>want
>to use this to produce a very large physical print, I would consider
>embracing that the original image is
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke via gimp-user-list
wrote:
> On 2018-08-13 13:09, Partha Bagchi via gimp-user-list wrote:
> > The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
> > That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can
On 08/13/18 20:31, Matthew Woehlke via gimp-user-list wrote:
On 2018-08-13 13:09, Partha Bagchi via gimp-user-list wrote:
The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can try
printing in 150dpi which
On 2018-08-13 13:09, Partha Bagchi via gimp-user-list wrote:
> The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
> That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can try
> printing in 150dpi which would give you 14 by 10.
I'm not sure I'd go even that big.
>Here is one that was taken from my camera and edited in Lightroom. I
>have no idea how large this would be able to be printed. Do you? Is
>there anywhere online I can submit several pictures to see how large
>they can be made without losing quality? I really want to use this
>picture somehow!
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 06:39:15PM +0100, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
>
> As to Nick's question - the "things" in the middle of the pier
> (bump-stops?) are probably the limiting factor, together with how
> close you are when you view it.
I forgot to say that I was looking at an
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 01:00:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2018 18:21:33 nickib wrote:
>
> > >I had a friend play with both the iPhone images and the camera images
> > >using Lightroom. Would it be ok if I uploaded both the RAW (KDC)
> > >images and the ones she edited to
On Sunday 12 August 2018 18:21:33 nickib wrote:
> >I had a friend play with both the iPhone images and the camera images
> >using Lightroom. Would it be ok if I uploaded both the RAW (KDC)
> >images and the ones she edited to get a better idea of what
> >enlargement IS possible? I’m at the point
The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can try
printing in 150dpi which would give you 14 by 10.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:42 PM nickib wrote:
> >I had a friend play with both the iPhone images
>I had a friend play with both the iPhone images and the camera images
>using Lightroom. Would it be ok if I uploaded both the RAW (KDC)
>images and the ones she edited to get a better idea of what
>enlargement IS possible? I’m at the point where even if I cannot use
>it for the 48x24 size it’s
>Your camera likely does better pictures, but its default settings may
>be
>more neutral than those of your smartphone.
>
>Typically smartphones aim for flashy pictures, and their software will
>go to great lengths to achieve this. But this also makes further
>editing
>of the picture very
On 08/09/18 03:17, nickib wrote:
Sorry but no, or you have a very shitty camera.
- Halos on the edges of the pillars and the bottom of the roofs of the
pagodas, likely some kind of sharpening.
- The roof slopes seem to be made of lace.
- Railings and antennas are blurry (motion blur? the pic
>Sorry but no, or you have a very shitty camera.
>
>- Halos on the edges of the pillars and the bottom of the roofs of the
>pagodas, likely some kind of sharpening.
>
>- The roof slopes seem to be made of lace.
>
>- Railings and antennas are blurry (motion blur? the pic was shot at
>1/50s but the
>Print size? 48"x 24" is a bit of a funny size. My print co. uses 24"x
>20" or 30" x 20" for laser colour printing which might be better size.
>
>However, back to the question.
>
>First thing, Gimp is a raster editor and works in pixels which have
>little to do with physical size *until* you come
From: nickib
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2018 11:02 PM
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Cc: notificati...@gimpusers.com
Subject: [Gimp-user] New User Need Help Enlarging/Enhancing Image
...
If 48x24 is not an option, I at least need to know realistically the largest
I
can go and keep the integrity
On 08/08/18 05:02, nickib wrote:
only the picture on my iPhone is
better than what I got on my camera
Sorry but no, or you have a very shitty camera.
- Halos on the edges of the pillars and the bottom of the roofs of the
pagodas, likely some kind of sharpening.
- The roof slopes seem to
So I took this fabulous picture of a sunrise - only the picture on my iPhone is
better than what I got on my camera (which I REALLY need to learn how to use!)
and I want to have it enlarged on canvas to 48" wide by 24" tall. The only
problem is I can NOT get a good enough quality image to have a
>So I took this fabulous picture of a sunrise - only the picture on my
>iPhone is better than what I got on my camera (which I REALLY need to
>learn how to use!) and I want to have it enlarged on canvas to 48"
>wide by 24" tall. The only problem is I can NOT get a good enough
>quality image to
23 matches
Mail list logo
