Re: [Gimp-user] X-Default

2018-04-09 Thread Ofnuts
On 04/09/18 16:19, GeoSte wrote: Hello Rich404, thanks for your prompt answer to my question. But I think your proposal is not a solution as I have to handle thousands of pictures and as I understand your remarks, the insert to the program imagemagick has to be done manually. I think there is no

[Gimp-user] X-Default

2018-04-09 Thread GeoSte
Hello Rich404, thanks for your prompt answer to my question. But I think your proposal is not a solution as I have to handle thousands of pictures and as I understand your remarks, the insert to the program imagemagick has to be done manually. I think there is no chance to handle in this way such a

[Gimp-user] X-Default

2018-04-09 Thread rich404
>I hope somebody can help me. >Meanwhile I've corrected thousends of fotographs by Gimp (Vers. >2.8.14). >All of these pictures are described with any foto processing program >(e.g. photoshop) under the EXIF name of 'title'. >If I use gimp2 the EXIF picture description got lost and instead of >thi

[Gimp-user] X-Default

2018-04-09 Thread GeoSte
I hope somebody can help me. Meanwhile I've corrected thousends of fotographs by Gimp (Vers. 2.8.14). All of these pictures are described with any foto processing program (e.g. photoshop) under the EXIF name of 'title'. If I use gimp2 the EXIF picture description got lost and instead of this I ge