On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Kekko wrote:
> Do you mean it is possible to sell GIMP itself? Can I put an item "GIMP sw"
> in an invoice?
> I' don't think it is possible or am I wrong?
Yes, you are wrong. You can charge money for distributing Gimp. As
long as either:
a) you haven't modified
Frank Gore (g...@friendlyphotozone.com) wrote:
> Yes, you are wrong. You can charge money for distributing Gimp. As
> long as either:
>
> a) you haven't modified it
> or
> b) if you have modified it, you can provide all the source code
> (including modifications) for free or a reasonable cost (ie.
On 2/11/12, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Dan . >
> What fonts?
>
Well, about fonts, I was remembering when I used to work in graphics
and we had to be really vigilant about font licenses. I was thinking
of this recent post on gimplist, which seems to cover the pe
Daniel Smith (opened...@gmail.com) wrote:
> But actually I was wondering more specifically about the packaging of
> fonts with a distribution of Gimp. Were you to supply a set of fonts
> with, is there a collection or place to choose from that are all free,
> or you buy them, or you let it up to th
thanks all.
dan
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
> Your distinction between these two cases is not exactly true. Even when
> you distribute an unmodified Gimp you're required to provide the
> sourcecode to your customer on request. The easiest way of course is to
> provide the sourcecode archiv
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:09:21 +0100, Kekko wrote:
> Do you mean it is possible to sell GIMP itself? Can I put an item "GIMP sw"
> in an invoice?
> I' don't think it is possible or am I wrong?
You can, as long as you stay within the requirements of the GPL.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http:/
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:10:33 -0500, Frank Gore wrote:
> Yes, you are wrong. You can charge money for distributing Gimp. As
> long as either:
> a) you haven't modified it
> or
> b) if you have modified it, you can provide all the source code
> (including modifications) for free or a reasonable cos
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:40:33 -0500, Frank Gore wrote:
> Wrong. Nowhere does it say that YOU must personally make the source
> code available, only that it must be available. In this case, the
> source code already happens to be readily available all over the web.
> Only if you modify it and then d
2012/2/12 Jernej Simončič :
> FSF's GPL FAQ covers this specific case and says you normally can't do
> that:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#SourceAndBinaryOnDifferentSites
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#UnchangedJustBinary
Hey you're right!
I've created a tutorial on how to create a watercolor look in GIMP.
There is an oilify filter, but no watercolor filter.
I couldn't find anything to show me so I thought I would help others out as
well.
Here it is: http://youtu.be/KvEIJIzBdEw
--
FloridaJo (via gimpusers.com)
Frank Gore (g...@friendlyphotozone.com) wrote:
> Wrong. Nowhere does it say that YOU must personally make the source
> code available, only that it must be available. In this case, the
> source code already happens to be readily available all over the web.
You probably should read the license then
12 matches
Mail list logo
