sizes varying between about 5 and 50 pixels, with relatively high precision.
The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range. I know there
was some talk about changing this slider to be logarithmic. Is there any
progress on that?
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> sizes varying between about 5 and 50 pixels, with relatively high precision.
> The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range. I know there
> was some talk about changing this slider to be logarithmic. Is there any
> progres
On 02/01/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> sizes varying between about 5 and 50 pixels, with relatively high precision.
> The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range. I know there
> was some talk about changing this slider to be logarithmic. Is there any
> progress on tha
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:55:55PM +0200, Ville Sokk wrote:
> > The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range. I know there
> > was some talk about changing this slider to be logarithmic. Is there any
> > progress on that?
> I don't know if you noticed but the slider has a top and
On 02/01/13 12:27, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:55:55PM +0200, Ville Sokk wrote:
>>> The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range. I know there
>>> was some talk about changing this slider to be logarithmic. Is there any
>>> progress on that?
>> I don't know
