> problems with that.
>
> So that's a possibility, but I'm still interested in hearing of Gimp
> ways to do it.
>
> J
> _______
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailm
ssary to expose the darked earth-based objects.
thanks,
-rei
--
Rei Shinozuka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridgewood, New Jersey
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
>
> It is often enough to just Filter -> Enhance -> Sharpen... after scaling
> down to make the scaled down version look much better.
>
> Martin Nordholts
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
>
I'm with you. I don't see the value of changing the name because a tiny
minority of intolerant agitators threaten to bully the maintainers.
The name is self-deprecatory, like "less" as a response to "more." It's
an ironic response to the hyperbolic, boastful names of many commercial
programs.
