Vb: Re: Ang: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image

2006-09-27 Thread Magnus Hellström
PROTECTED]> Kopia: Ärende: Re: Ang: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image Hi, On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:20 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote: > So this behaviour of the wmf file loader can be considered as a bug? No, it counts as a missing feature perhaps. > Is it something that will

Re: Ang: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image

2006-09-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:20 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote: > So this behaviour of the wmf file loader can be considered as a bug? No, it counts as a missing feature perhaps. > Is it something that will be taken care of in future releases? Unlikely, unless somone provides a patch. The WMF lo

Ang: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image

2006-09-26 Thread Magnus Hellström
uot;Magnus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?="<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kopia: Ärende: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 12:51 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote: > I'm using script-fu to load an image to determine the image base type. > It gives me back

Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image

2006-09-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 12:51 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote: > I'm using script-fu to load an image to determine the image base type. > It gives me back rgb even if the wmf image is in grayscale. > > How come? Can I determine the image type in some other way? The WMF loader probably converts e

[Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image

2006-09-25 Thread Magnus Hellström
I'm using script-fu to load an image to determine the image base type. It gives me back rgb even if the wmf image is in grayscale. How come? Can I determine the image type in some other way? This is the script: (define (script-fu-wmf-type-check file) (gimp-message-set-handler 0)