PROTECTED]>
Kopia:
Ärende: Re: Ang: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:20 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote:
> So this behaviour of the wmf file loader can be considered as a bug?
No, it counts as a missing feature perhaps.
> Is it something that will
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:20 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote:
> So this behaviour of the wmf file loader can be considered as a bug?
No, it counts as a missing feature perhaps.
> Is it something that will be taken care of in future releases?
Unlikely, unless somone provides a patch. The WMF lo
uot;Magnus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?="<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kopia:
Ärende: Re: [Gimp-user] Base type of a wmf image
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 12:51 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote:
> I'm using script-fu to load an image to determine the image base
type.
> It gives me back
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 12:51 +0200, Magnus Hellström wrote:
> I'm using script-fu to load an image to determine the image base type.
> It gives me back rgb even if the wmf image is in grayscale.
>
> How come? Can I determine the image type in some other way?
The WMF loader probably converts e
I'm using script-fu to load an image to determine the image base type.
It gives me back rgb even if the wmf image is in grayscale.
How come? Can I determine the image type in some other way?
This is the script:
(define (script-fu-wmf-type-check file)
(gimp-message-set-handler 0)