Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Tom Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
True, but it's still widely used and has more support than PNG. It's
the perennial web designer's nightmare - you hate IE but you have to
code for it anyway because everyone uses it. The compromise between
what should be done and what ha
Hi,
Tom Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> True, but it's still widely used and has more support than PNG. It's
> the perennial web designer's nightmare - you hate IE but you have to
> code for it anyway because everyone uses it. The compromise between
> what should be done and what has to be don
True, but it's still widely used and has more support than PNG. It's the
perennial web designer's nightmare - you hate IE but you have to code for it
anyway because everyone uses it. The compromise between what should be done
and what has to be done. In the same way, PNG is not as widely and
we
Hi,
Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like you're using combine as a frame disposal method while you
> need replace. Also note, that GIF cannot handle alpha channel, so you'll
> still end up having aliased contour of the gnome throbber. If you know
> your target background color,
On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 23:35 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
Hi,
I want to make an animated gif of the gnome throbber of nautilus. I got
the original png which contains a rectangle containing the 35 frames. I
cut these out and put them in a seperate layer in GIMP. If I then play
the animation i
Hi,
I want to make an animated gif of the gnome throbber of nautilus. I got
the original png which contains a rectangle containing the 35 frames. I
cut these out and put them in a seperate layer in GIMP. If I then play
the animation in GIMP or save it as an animated GIF and then play it.
The to
