Re: [Gimp-user] CMYK support

2006-01-13 Thread Owen Cook

You might want to try putting 'gimp cmyk' into Google and have a read

-- 
Owen




On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Carlos Muncharaz wrote:

> Hi, I have just added to the mail list and here I bring some questions:
> What about Gimp support for CMYK color mode? Have you discuss about it?
> Will Gimp handle CMYK images? Can a graphic designer who works with CMYK
> images to send to printer work with Linux and Gimp?

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] CMYK support

2004-01-16 Thread Thomas Spuhler
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 11:56, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2004, at 10:13 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> 
> > In one of the recent reviews of the upcoming Gimp 2 it has been
> > advertised that it will fully support CMYK.
> 
> (Which recent review?)
Cannot find it anymore. Maybe it's pulled off the WEB since it was kind
of unreal, just highlighting features that such as full CMYK support and
being able to open all psd files w/o problems.

> yes, this has been an irritating problem.  Some time ago (3 years) it 
> was decided that the gimp would need to go though some major changes to 
> add things like CMYK.  It was thought, then, that CMYK would be added 
> and that version would be called 2.0.  Things have changed since then.  
> CMYK is still planned, but not in version 2.0.
> 
> > There was actually a statement in the review like, if you have problems
> > with the Photoshop license throw it away and use The Gimp. Or why spend
> > $600 if you can use the Gimp and open these Photoshop files and edit
> > them!
> 
> Well, there are some things in psd files that the gimp clearly doesn't 
> support yet.  So if you have lots of work in psd's getting rid of 
> photoshop might be a bit hasty.
> 
> > We have heard from this mailing list that this is not the case.
> > What is the reason that CMYK does not make it into Gimp. Is it very
> > difficult to program or is there a patent issue? Lot's of other budget
> > priced (Windows and Linux) graphic programs do not have it built in
> > either.
> 
> No, there is no patent issue that we know of.  It is just that doing it 
> right takes either a lot of time, or a lot of money.  We don't have the 
> latter, so the former is the answer.
> 
> The answer is the CYMK support and a lot of other features are a direct 
> focus for some of us.  Just when we finally do it, it will be the best 
> way we know how.  We are well on our way to this goal.
This seems to be a good answer!
> 
> --
> Dan
-- 
Best Regards
Thomas J Spuhler

All Tusonix outgoing e-mail has been scanned for viruses


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Gimp-user] CMYK support

2004-01-16 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Jan 16, 2004, at 10:13 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:

In one of the recent reviews of the upcoming Gimp 2 it has been
advertised that it will fully support CMYK.
(Which recent review?)
yes, this has been an irritating problem.  Some time ago (3 years) it 
was decided that the gimp would need to go though some major changes to 
add things like CMYK.  It was thought, then, that CMYK would be added 
and that version would be called 2.0.  Things have changed since then.  
CMYK is still planned, but not in version 2.0.

There was actually a statement in the review like, if you have problems
with the Photoshop license throw it away and use The Gimp. Or why spend
$600 if you can use the Gimp and open these Photoshop files and edit
them!
Well, there are some things in psd files that the gimp clearly doesn't 
support yet.  So if you have lots of work in psd's getting rid of 
photoshop might be a bit hasty.

We have heard from this mailing list that this is not the case.
What is the reason that CMYK does not make it into Gimp. Is it very
difficult to program or is there a patent issue? Lot's of other budget
priced (Windows and Linux) graphic programs do not have it built in
either.
No, there is no patent issue that we know of.  It is just that doing it 
right takes either a lot of time, or a lot of money.  We don't have the 
latter, so the former is the answer.

The answer is the CYMK support and a lot of other features are a direct 
focus for some of us.  Just when we finally do it, it will be the best 
way we know how.  We are well on our way to this goal.

--
Dan
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user