Re: [Gimp-user] Future versions
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: And what would these do? :-) Just yesterday I was thinking that implementing "effect layers" - for example, automatically applying one or more of the existing filters to a layer, while leaving it's pixels' values unchanged would not be that hard. Is this what you are talking about? I believe that is how the feature is photoshop works. But yes, that is want I meant. There has been some discussion (mostly in irc or at the gimpcon) about how gegl's architecture could lend itself to implementing things like that efficiently. Nothing solid (like code) has been hashed out (except for the code already in gegl). -- Dan ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Future versions
On Sunday 04 January 2004 15:28, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Re: [Gimp-user] Future versions > Date: Sunday 15:28:58 > From: Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: GIMP mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Message was signed with unknown key 0xE640664D. > The validity of the signature cannot be verified. > > Fabien3D wrote: > | Hi everyone and Happy New Year 2004 ! > | > | I've been using The GIMP for a while and I also teach it for > | young > > children > > | and retired people. This question must have already been asked > | many times before, and know the actual developments are about > | the CMYK > > conversion, but > > | I'd like to know if there will ever be an implementation of the > > "adjustment > > | layers" ou "settings layers" (I'm not sure of the translation) ? > > Yes. It is being worked on. Maybe for 2.2. Definately for 2.4. And what would these do? :-) Just yesterday I was thinking that implementing "effect layers" - for example, automatically applying one or more of the existing filters to a layer, while leaving it's pixels' values unchanged would not be that hard. Is this what you are talking about? JS -><- > > -- > Dan > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Future versions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabien3D wrote: | Hi everyone and Happy New Year 2004 ! | | I've been using The GIMP for a while and I also teach it for young children | and retired people. This question must have already been asked many times | before, and know the actual developments are about the CMYK conversion, but | I'd like to know if there will ever be an implementation of the "adjustment | layers" ou "settings layers" (I'm not sure of the translation) ? | Yes. It is being worked on. Maybe for 2.2. Definately for 2.4. - -- Dan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/+E1Zad4P1+ZAZk0RAvpKAJ9gsvd7sStSuSwNG8DXCylVu6eTjwCfWNLN SqSc3wft8VZyeyCbV8U77kg= =g2Fa -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
