Re: [Gimp-user] Installing on FedoraCore 1

2004-05-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Then I tried to install  gimp-2.0.1-1.i386.rpm again.  I'm still getting:
 
 libgimp-1.2.so.0 (required by xsane-gimp .91, 1)
 libgimp-1.2.so.0 (required by gimp-print-plugin 4.2.6, 4)
 libgimpui-1.2.so.0 (required by xsane-gimp .91, 1)
 libgimpui-1.2.so.0 (required by gimp-print-plugin 4.2.6, 4)
 gimp (required by gimp-devel 1.2.5, 1)

There's no xsane-gimp package for gimp-2.0 yet and you don't need
gimp-print-plugin for gimp-2.0. So the solution to your problem is to
either keep gimp-1.2 installed and install gimp-2.0 in parallel or
deinstall xsane-gimp and gimp-print-plugin.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Installing on FedoraCore 1

2004-05-02 Thread John Culleton
On Sunday 02 May 2004 06:45 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,

 There's no xsane-gimp package for gimp-2.0 yet and you
 don't need gimp-print-plugin for gimp-2.0. So the
 solution to your problem is to either keep gimp-1.2
 installed and install gimp-2.0 in parallel or deinstall
 xsane-gimp and gimp-print-plugin.

I tried the patch to Xsane published on the Xsane site but 
Gimp still says Xsane is is not Gimp-enabled. So I am 
scanning separately, which is a bore. (Keeping both 
versions of Gimp around and remembering their differing 
rules woould be an even bigger bore. )
-- 
John Culleton
Able Typesetters and Indexers
http://wexfordpress.com

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user