Re: [Gimp-user] Placement of pasted selections

2006-01-13 Thread wayne
On Thursday 29 December 2005 02:57 pm, Owen wrote:

> This probably comes up as a new thread as I don't have the original,
> this is off the archives
>
> Tristan Miller did write;
>
> > Say I have two images of the same size (9952×7016) open.  I select an
> > arbitrary region from the first image and Edit->Copy it.  Then I
> > switch to the second image and Edit->Paste.  Unfortunately, GIMP seems
> > to put the selection wherever it wants; I would rather it appear in
> > the exact same place as in the original image.  Since the images are
> > so big, it's difficult for me to drag the selection with the mouse to
> > the exact spot it should appear.  Is there some way I can modify
> > GIMP's default selection placement behaviour?
>
> I think this is repeatable
>
>
> 1. Image 1 - Make selection
> 2. Selection to Path
> 3. Export Path
> 4. Go to second Image, make new tranparent layer
> 5. Import Path
> 6. Path to Selection
> 7. Go to image one and cut out selection
> 8. Go to image 2, paste into transparent layer
>
> That places it in exactly the same spot as in image one
>

Isn't there a simpler way? Like select, cut, paste.

Wayne
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Placement of pasted selections

2005-12-29 Thread Owen
This probably comes up as a new thread as I don't have the original,
this is off the archives

Tristan Miller did write;

> Say I have two images of the same size (9952×7016) open.  I select an
> arbitrary region from the first image and Edit->Copy it.  Then I switch to
> the second image and Edit->Paste.  Unfortunately, GIMP seems to put the
> selection wherever it wants; I would rather it appear in the exact same
> place as in the original image.  Since the images are so big, it's
> difficult for me to drag the selection with the mouse to the exact spot it
> should appear.  Is there some way I can modify GIMP's default selection
> placement behaviour?

I think this is repeatable


1. Image 1 - Make selection
2. Selection to Path
3. Export Path
4. Go to second Image, make new tranparent layer
5. Import Path
6. Path to Selection
7. Go to image one and cut out selection
8. Go to image 2, paste into transparent layer

That places it in exactly the same spot as in image one


Owen
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Placement of pasted selections

2005-12-28 Thread David Herman
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 10:04 am, Tristan Miller wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Say I have two images of the same size (9952×7016) open.  I
> select an arbitrary region from the first image and Edit->Copy
> it.  Then I switch to the second image and Edit->Paste. 
> Unfortunately, GIMP seems to put the selection wherever it wants;
> I would rather it appear in the exact same place as in the
> original image.  Since the images are so big, it's difficult for
> me to drag the selection with the mouse to the exact spot it
> should appear.  Is there some way I can modify GIMP's default
> selection placement behaviour?
>
> (It was previously suggested to me that I copy the entire image
> and paste it as a new layer in the second image, and then copy
> between layers instead of between images.  However, this is
> undesirable due to the large size of images I'm working with.  It
> can take over a minute to copy the entire image into a new layer;
> I just want to be able to copy small areas of one image into
> another.)

I was trying to do something similar to this last week, I eventually 
gave up because my results were just as you describe, but reading 
your mail today made it all seem clear and simple to me.

Use one of your selection tools to select the desired portion of 
your image

go to the menu, Script-Fu -> Selection -> To Brush

follow the directions in the dialog (give the brush a name and a 
file name) and spacing info if needed.

Press ok and wait while your brushes are updated. Then you can use 
your selection as a brush wherever you desire.


It won't put your selection in exactly the same place but should 
allow you to place the brush wherever you desire, and you won't be 
working with a gigantic buffer slowing things down.

All of this assumes you have set up gimp so that it can save brushes 
somewhere that you have write permissions - like your home 
directory.

Hope this helps


-- 
dh
Don't shop at ZipZoomFly.com!
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Placement of pasted selections

2005-12-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Tristan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> (It was previously suggested to me that I copy the entire image and paste
> it as a new layer in the second image, and then copy between layers
> instead of between images.  However, this is undesirable due to the large
> size of images I'm working with.  It can take over a minute to copy the
> entire image into a new layer; I just want to be able to copy small areas
> of one image into another.)

Are you using a clipboard daemon such as Klipper? It shouldn't take
that long to create a copy.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user