Re: [Gimp-user] batches for web

2009-07-07 Thread Michael Schumacher
Von: alec firestic...@gmail.com Resolution (as in dots-per-inch) is irrelevant for images used on web-pages. The only thing that counts is the number of pixels. Huh, I thought that lower resolution would make the file size smaller so web images would load faster. No? Absolute

Re: [Gimp-user] batches for web

2009-07-06 Thread alec
Hi... Akkana Peck wrote: Does Resize not do what you want? (I don't have DBP installed right now, but I thought it could scale images and looking at the web page I would guess Resize is what does that.) Do you have a link to that plugin? I've searched quite a bit and David's Batch processor

Re: [Gimp-user] batches for web

2009-07-06 Thread Bob Long
alec wrote: Akkana Peck wrote: [..] Resolution (as in dots-per-inch) is irrelevant for images used on web-pages. The only thing that counts is the number of pixels. Huh, I thought that lower resolution would make the file size smaller so web images would load faster. No? Depends what you

Re: [Gimp-user] batches for web

2009-07-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 15:43 -0400, alec wrote: I finally installed David's Batch Processor (after months of trying to figure out how to do batches) but I'm surprised that I don't see an option for changing resolution. I'm simply trying to prepare images(lots of them) for the web. Did I