Hi,
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:26 +0200, Sterling wrote:
> Re: HOW TO HIDE THE TOOLBOX & DOCKS - Thanks!!!
>
> I was very dismayed when I first tried GIMP 2.6 and found the toolbox and
> dock always on top of my image window. It meant I had to have a smaller image
> window so I could see the whole
Nope, I have never used GIMP on Windows! I only said "now" randomly. I
think I was just letting know what OS I was using so no one had to
ask. So originally in the developmental releases, the developers just
had it checked in gnome to be always on top, and the ontop feature
wasn't something intrins
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 05:01 -0400, Jan Snyder wrote:
> It's strange. All the developmental releases had toolbox always on
> top. I use Linux and now it is not on top.
I guess that you enabled the experimental 'transient-docks' feature at
some point, see http://svenfoo.geekheim.de/2005/05/12
Jan Snyder wrote:
> It's strange. All the developmental releases had toolbox always on
> top. I use Linux and now it is not on top. The only way I could get
> it on top is to right0click on the titlebar and select always on top,
> but then it's literally on top of every window, firefox for instanc
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kristin Falck wrote:
>> I'm confused with the new version 2.6. confused with one of the main
>> release notes:
>> "... and ensuring that the Toolbox and Docks always are above image
>> windows..."
>> - but they aren't sta
Kristin Falck wrote:
> I'm confused with the new version 2.6. confused with one of the main
> release notes:
> "... and ensuring that the Toolbox and Docks always are above image
> windows..."
> - but they aren't staying above!
> What am I missing? (I'm a Gimp on windows-user)
>
> /Kristin
Hi
Y
Am Freitag, den 03.10.2008, 09:50 +0200 schrieb Kristin Falck:
> I'm confused with the new version 2.6. confused with one of the main
> release notes:
> "... and ensuring that the Toolbox and Docks always are above image
> windows..."
> - but they aren't staying above!
> What am I missing? (I'm a
