On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 08:38 -0400, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > I would add that Ubuntu is user friendly only when you live within its
> > boundaries. For serious work I prefer Slackware, even with the
> > absence of some Gnome libraries (and t
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 08:38 -0400, John R. Culleton wrote:
> I would add that Ubuntu is user friendly only when you live within its
> boundaries. For serious work I prefer Slackware, even with the
> absence of some Gnome libraries (and the Gnome gui itself of course
> but that is no great
On Monday 30 July 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 08:28 +, Heiko Schmidt wrote:
> > I had the same problem under Ubuntu but with the GTK+.
> >
> > After installing GTK+-2.10.13 from source I've got the same error
> > message that this modversion returns 2.10.13 but 2.1
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 08:28 +, Heiko Schmidt wrote:
> I had the same problem under Ubuntu but with the GTK+.
>
> After installing GTK+-2.10.13 from source I've got the same error
> message that this modversion returns 2.10.13 but 2.10.11 was found.
> Now what I have to do to get rid of th
I had the same problem under Ubuntu but with the GTK+.
After installing GTK+-2.10.13 from source I've got the same error
message that this modversion returns 2.10.13 but 2.10.11 was found. Now
what I have to do to get rid of the 2.10.11 version? Where I can find
this LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment v
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 09:08 +0200, julien wrote:
> Before installing GIMP-2.3.19, I installed glib-2.13.7 (under suse-10.2)
> from source.
Why did you do that? glib-2.13 is an unstable development release.
Better stick to the version of glib that is already on your system. glib
2.12.4 is new
