>
> I agree with everything here except I'd use a mask instead of a
> selection. A selection can be a bit too fleeting for a something as
> tedious as your task.
>
> Eric
>
"tedious" = I probably should have used "detailed". I didn't realize
how that came off...
Eric
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:04:15PM -0500, Eric P wrote:
>
> I agree with everything here except I'd use a mask instead of a
> selection. A selection can be a bit too fleeting for a something as
> tedious as your task.
>
it is really an advantage that the people who used gimp-1.0 have over
newer
Akkana Peck wrote:
> Helen writes:
>
>>I have a photo of a dark red flower against a dark background.
>>I've tried tedious ways to lighten the background without changing the
>>flower,
>>but the details of the flower are too tiny. So I'm browsing tutorials.
>>Should I
>>be learning about masks? Ab
Helen writes:
> I have a photo of a dark red flower against a dark background.
> I've tried tedious ways to lighten the background without changing the
> flower,
> but the details of the flower are too tiny. So I'm browsing tutorials.
> Should I
> be learning about masks? About layers? A hint how I
