Hi Avery,
nope, no luck.
I have changed all my log.debug(...) into log.info(...). Same behavior.
I have a log4j.properties [1] file in my classpath and it has:
log4j.logger.org.apache.jena.grande=DEBUG
log4j.logger.org.apache.jena.grande.giraph=DEBUG
I also tried to change that to:
I am using hadoop-core-1.0.1.jar ... could that be a problem?
Paolo
Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi Avery,
nope, no luck.
I have changed all my log.debug(...) into log.info(...). Same behavior.
I have a log4j.properties [1] file in my classpath and it has:
Hi,
I am not sure what's the best way to represent labeled graphs in Giraph.
Here is my graph (i.e. vertex_id --edge_label_id-- vertex_id ):
32 --62-- 115
32 --153-- 189
32 --200-- 236
32 --266-- 303
32 --266-- 331
32 --266-- 363
303 --153-- 407
303 --266-- 331
331 --153-- 394
331 --266-- 32
...
It shouldn't be, your code looks very similar to the unittests (i.e.
TestManualCheckpoint.java). So, you're trying to run your test with the
local hadoop (similar to the unittests)? Or are you using an actual
hadoop setup?
Avery
On 4/10/12 11:41 PM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
I am using
There is no preferred way to represent labeled graphs. A close
example to your adjacency list idea is
LongDoubleDoubleAdjacencyListVertexInputFormat.
Hope that helps,
Avery
On 4/11/12 10:00 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure what's the best way to represent labeled graphs in
Avery Ching wrote:
It shouldn't be, your code looks very similar to the unittests (i.e.
TestManualCheckpoint.java). So, you're trying to run your test with the
local hadoop (similar to the unittests)? Or are you using an actual
hadoop setup?
Hi Avery,
while I am learning and writing the
