Re: IntIntNullIntVertex initialize method

2012-02-19 Thread Sebastian Schelter
That's a good point, can you open a Jira issue for that? Maybe we should use some annotation like @Nullable to mark parameters that can be null to make it easier to avoid forgetting checks in the implementing code. --sebastian On 19.02.2012 19:47, yavuz gokirmak wrote: Hello, I am writing

Re: IPC error

2012-02-20 Thread Sebastian Schelter
This looks like the code tries to invoke a no-arg constructor of ArrayWritable (which doesn't exist AFAIK). Do you use a custom writable? It needs to have a working no-arg constructor. --sebastian 2012/2/21 Avery Ching ach...@apache.org: I wonder if Giraph is compiled with the correct Hadoop

Announcement: 'Parallel Processing beyond MapReduce' workshop after Berlin Buzzwords

2012-04-04 Thread Sebastian Schelter
Hi everybody, I'd like to announce the 'Parallel Processing beyond MapReduce' workshop which will take place directly after the Berlin Buzzwords conference ( http://berlinbuzzwords.de/ ). This workshop will discuss novel paradigms for parallel processing beyond the traditional MapReduce

Announcement: Giraph talk at the next Hadoop Get Together in Berlin

2012-04-04 Thread Sebastian Schelter
presentations - from Germany to evangelize Hadoop. Speaker: Sebastian Schelter Session: Introducing Apache Giraph for Large Scale Graph Processing Web and online social graphs have been rapidly growing in size and scale during the past decade. Processing such graphs which consist of millions of vertices

Slides for my talk at the Berlin Hadoop Get Together

2012-04-19 Thread Sebastian Schelter
Here are the slides of my talk Introducing Apache Giraph for Large Scale Graph Processing at the Berlin Hadoop Get Together yesterday: http://www.slideshare.net/sscdotopen/introducing-apache-giraph-for-large-scale-graph-processing I reused a lot of stuff from Claudio's excellent prezi

Re: Slides for my talk at the Berlin Hadoop Get Together

2012-04-21 Thread Sebastian Schelter
be good to add at leaset one of them to the page. Avery On 4/19/12 12:31 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: Here are the slides of my talk Introducing Apache Giraph for Large Scale Graph Processing at the Berlin Hadoop Get Together yesterday: http://www.slideshare.net/sscdotopen/introducing

Re: Slides for my talk at the Berlin Hadoop Get Together

2012-04-21 Thread Sebastian Schelter
! Will these be similar to the 'Parallel Processing beyond MapReduce' workshop after Berlin Buzzwords? It would be good to add at leaset one of them to the page. Avery On 4/19/12 12:31 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: Here are the slides of my talk Introducing Apache Giraph for Large Scale Graph

Video of my talk

2012-04-23 Thread Sebastian Schelter
Introducing Apache Giraph for Large Scale Graph Processing http://vimeo.com/40737998

[Announcement] Giraph talk in Berlin on May 29th

2012-05-12 Thread Sebastian Schelter
Hi, I will give a talk titled Large Scale Graph Processing with Apache Giraph in Berlin on May 29th. Details are available at: https://www.xing.com/events/gameduell-tech-talk-on-the-topic-large-scale-graph-processing-with-apache-giraph-1092275 Best, Sebastian

Re: RWR on Giraph

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Schelter
Hi, you are completely right. I also started implementing RWR today coincidently, could you file a JIRA ticket for RWR? I would attach my work done so far and we could work a little on the code. I think that a lot of things need improvement in the PageRank/RWR implementation, e.g. stuff like the

Re: SimplePageRankVertex implementation, dangling nodes and sending messages to all nodes...

2012-05-18 Thread Sebastian Schelter
, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Paolo Castagna castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote: Sebastian Schelter wrote: You are right, the code would throw an exception here, but I guess it would be sufficient to simply add a check here and not send any messages. That would avoid throwing an exception, but I am

Re: SimplePageRankVertex implementation, dangling nodes and sending messages to all nodes...

2012-05-18 Thread Sebastian Schelter
: Sebastian Schelter wrote: You are right, the code would throw an exception here, but I guess it would be sufficient to simply add a check here and not send any messages. That would avoid throwing an exception, but I am not sure it is actually the best thing to do. Some