On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:56:00AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:47:46AM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > @@ -2527,7 +2528,7 @@ static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct
> > rev_info *revs)
> > if (prepare_bitmap_walk(revs) < 0)
> > return -1;
> >
>
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 05:05:07PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> I remember that you did a ton of work on t0027. Now I see problems, and
> not only that the entire script now takes a whopping 4 minutes 20 seconds
> to run on my high-end Windows machine.
>
> It appears that t0027 fails rando
Hi Torsten,
I remember that you did a ton of work on t0027. Now I see problems, and
not only that the entire script now takes a whopping 4 minutes 20 seconds
to run on my high-end Windows machine.
It appears that t0027 fails randomly for me, in seemingly random places.
Sometimes all 1388 cases pa
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:19:28PM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
> > I dunno. It's not _that_ big a deal to code around. I was just surprised
> > not to see an up-front status when responding to a request. It seems
> > like the normal thing in just about every protocol I've ever used.
>
> Alright.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 08:02:51AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > So it's possible that the resulting pack
> > is not as small as it could be (i.e., we break the chain with a base
> > object, but it's possible if we looked that we could have broken the
> > chain by making a delta against an exis
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:47:46AM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> @@ -2527,7 +2528,7 @@ static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info
> *revs)
> if (prepare_bitmap_walk(revs) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - if (pack_options_allow_reuse() &&
> + if (pack_options_allo
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:50:20AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > + git pack-objects --local --stdout --revs >1.pack &&
> > + git index-pack 1.pack &&
>
> I'd have expected you to use the non-stdout version here. Is this meant
> to be independent of your other patch (I think that's OK).
Oh, nev
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:37:35PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> @@ -958,15 +958,30 @@ static int want_object_in_pack(const unsigned char
> *sha1,
> off_t *found_offset)
> {
> struct packed_git *p;
> + struct packed_git *pack1 = *found_pack;
> + int pa
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov writes:
>
> > Since 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects) there
> > are two codepaths in pack-objects: with & without using bitmap
> > reachability index.
> >
> > However add_object_entry_from_bit
Hi Peff,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > The fix is meant for jk/push-force-with-lease-creation topic, but I
> > > had to find it out by the old fashioned way, i.e. running blame for
> > > these lines in 'pu' to
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> + /* This is to save some reporting routines */
>
> some?
>
> In case of a reroll could you be more specific?
> Specifically mention that we use these for the
> muting/when
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
---
archive.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/archive.c b/archive.c
index 42df974..dde1ab4 100644
--- a/archive.c
+++ b/archive.c
@@ -458,11 +458,11 @@ static int parse_archive_args(int argc, const char **argv,
ar
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
---
git-stash.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh
index 22fb8bc..9cbd682 100755
--- a/git-stash.sh
+++ b/git-stash.sh
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ save_stash () {
create_stash "$stash_msg" $untracked
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > The fix is meant for jk/push-force-with-lease-creation topic, but I
> > had to find it out by the old fashioned way, i.e. running blame for
> > these lines in 'pu' to find eee98e74f9 is the culprit and then
> > running "git b
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
---
setup.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/setup.c b/setup.c
index 6d0e0c9..fe572b8 100644
--- a/setup.c
+++ b/setup.c
@@ -759,9 +759,9 @@ static const char *setup_bare_git_dir(struct strbuf *cwd,
int offset,
s
Hi René,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, René Scharfe wrote:
> static void add_strategies(const char *string, unsigned attr)
> {
> - struct strategy *list = NULL;
> - int list_alloc = 0, list_nr = 0, i;
> -
> - memset(&list, 0, sizeof(list));
> - split_merge_strategies(string, &list, &list_
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
