From: Johannes Schindelin
Tab completion of `git range-diff` is very convenient, especially
given that the revision arguments to specify the commit ranges to
compare are typically more complex than, say, what is normally passed
to `git log`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
From: Johannes Schindelin
The bulk of this patch consists of a heavily butchered version of
tbdiff's README written by Thomas Rast and Thomas Gummerer, lifted from
https://github.com/trast/tbdiff.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
Documentation/git-range-diff.txt | 229
From: Johannes Schindelin
As pointed out by Elijah Newren, tbdiff has this neat little alignment
trick where it outputs the commit pairs with patch numbers that are
padded to the maximal patch number's width:
1: cafedead = 1: acefade first patch
[...]
314: beefeada <
From: Johannes Schindelin
When displaying a diff of diffs, it is possible that there is an outer
`+` before a context line. That happens when the context changed between
old and new commit. When that context line starts with a tab (after the
space that marks it as context line), our diff
From: Johannes Schindelin
Just like tbdiff, we now show the diff between matching patches. This is
a "diff of two diffs", so it can be a bit daunting to read for the
beginner.
An alternative would be to display an interdiff, i.e. the hypothetical
diff which is the result of first reverting the
The incredibly useful git-tbdiff [https://github.com/trast/tbdiff] tool to
compare patch series (say, to see what changed between two iterations sent
to the Git mailing list) is slightly less useful for this developer due to
the fact that it requires the hungarian and numpy Python packages which
From: Johannes Schindelin
We are comparing complete, formatted commit messages with patches. There
are no function names here, so stop looking for them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
range-diff.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/range-diff.c b/range-diff.c
From: Johannes Schindelin
The main information in the `range-diff` view comes from the list of
matching and non-matching commits, the diffs are additional information.
Indenting them helps with the reading flow.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
builtin/range-diff.c | 10 ++
1
From: Johannes Schindelin
This not only uses "dashed stand-ins" for "pairs" where one side is
missing (i.e. unmatched commits that are present only in one of the two
commit ranges), but also adds onelines for the reader's pleasure.
This change brings `git range-diff` yet another step closer to
From: Johannes Schindelin
When showing the diff between corresponding patches of the two branch
versions, we have to make up a fake filename to run the diff machinery.
That filename does not carry any meaningful information, hence tbdiff
suppresses it. So we should, too.
Signed-off-by:
From: Johannes Schindelin
This command does not do a whole lot so far, apart from showing a usage
that is oddly similar to that of `git tbdiff`. And for a good reason:
the next commits will turn `range-branch` into a full-blown replacement
for `tbdiff`.
At this point, we ignore tbdiff's color
From: Johannes Schindelin
The problem solved by the code introduced in this commit goes like this:
given two sets of items, and a cost matrix which says how much it
"costs" to assign any given item of the first set to any given item of
the second, assign all items (except when the sets have
From: Johannes Schindelin
For some reason, t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh fails particularly
often on Windows due to racy tracing where the `git upload-pack` and the
`git fetch` processes compete for the same file.
We just introduced a remedy that uses fcntl(), but Windows does not have
From: Johannes Schindelin
When multiple processes try to write to the same file, it is not
guaranteed that everything works as expected: those writes can overlap,
and in the worst case even lose messages.
This happens in t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh, where we abuse the
`GIT_TRACE`
From: Johannes Schindelin
Recently, t5552 introduced a pattern where two processes try to write to
the same GIT_TRACE file in parallel. This is not safe, as the two
processes fighting over who gets to append to the file can cause garbled
lines and may even result in data loss on Windows (where
From: Johannes Schindelin
This function will be used to make write accesses in trace_write() a bit
safer.
Note: this patch takes a very different approach for cross-platform
support than Git is historically taking: the original approach is to
first implement everything on Linux, using the
I reported a couple of times that t5552 is not passing reliably. It has now
reached next, and will no doubt infect master soon.
Turns out that it is not a Windows-specific issue, even if it occurs a lot
more often on Windows than elsewhere. (And even if it is apparently
impossible to trigger on
From: Johannes Schindelin
For some reason, t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh fails particularly
often on Windows due to racy tracing where the `git upload-pack` and the
`git fetch` processes compete for the same file.
We just introduced a remedy that uses fcntl(), but Windows does not have
From: Johannes Schindelin
This function will be used to make write accesses in trace_write() a bit
safer.
Note: this patch takes a very different approach for cross-platform
support than Git is historically taking: the original approach is to
first implement everything on Linux, using the
From: Johannes Schindelin
When multiple processes try to write to the same file, it is not
guaranteed that everything works as expected: those writes can overlap,
and in the worst case even lose messages.
This happens in t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh, where we abuse the
`GIT_TRACE`
I reported a couple of times that t5552 is not passing reliably. It has now
reached next, and will no doubt infect master soon.
Turns out that it is not a Windows-specific issue, even if it occurs a lot
more often on Windows than elsewhere.
The culprit is that two processes try simultaneously
From: Johannes Schindelin
Recently, t5552 introduced a pattern where two processes try to write to
the same GIT_TRACE file in parallel. This is not safe, as the two
processes fighting over who gets to append to the file can cause garbled
lines and may even result in data loss on Windows (where
It was reported via IRC that the exec lines are inserted in the wrong spots
when using --rebase-merges.
The reason is that we used a simple, incorrect implementation that happened
to work as long as the generated todo list only contains pick, fixup and
squash commands. Which is not the case
From: Johannes Schindelin
The --exec option's implementation is not really well-prepared for
--rebase-merges. Demonstrate this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh
From: Johannes Schindelin
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a fixup/squash chain", i.e. an
exec would not be inserted between a `pick` and any of
From: Johannes Schindelin
The words "save" and "safe" are both very wonderful words, each with
their own set of meanings. Let's not confuse them with one another save
on occasion of a pun.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
git-compat-util.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
I stumbled over the one in git-compat-util.h while working on an unrelated
bug fix, and then got curious whether there are other places where we use
save instead of safe, too. Turns out we do not, but there was another
grammar error where a spurious . interrupted a sentence.
Johannes Schindelin
From: Johannes Schindelin
We should not interrupt. sentences in the middle.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
remote-curl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/remote-curl.c b/remote-curl.c
index 99b0bedc6..fb28309e8 100644
--- a/remote-curl.c
+++
From: Johannes Schindelin
The --exec option's implementation is not really well-prepared for
--rebase-merges. Demonstrate this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh
From: Johannes Schindelin
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a fixup/squash chain", i.e. an
exec would not be inserted between a `pick` and any of
It was reported via IRC that the exec lines are inserted in the wrong spots
when using --rebase-merges.
The reason is that we used a simple, incorrect implementation that happened
to work as long as the generated todo list only contains pick, fixup and
squash commands. Which is not the case
From: Johannes Schindelin
Currently, this test case throws an assertion:
Assertion failed!
Program: git.exe
File: line-log.c, Line 71
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
t/t4211-line-log.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git
I am a heavy user of git log -L In fact, I use the feature where
multiple ranges can be specified extensively, via a not-exactly-trivial
shell script function that takes the currently staged changes (or if none
are staged, the current unstanged changes) and turns them into the
corresponding
From: Johannes Schindelin
The assertion in question really indicates a bug, when triggered, so we
might just as well use the sanctioned method to report it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
line-log.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/line-log.c
From: Johannes Schindelin
Technically, it is okay to have line ranges that touch (i.e. the end of
the first range ends just before the next range begins). However, it is
inefficient, and when the user provides such touching ranges via
multiple `-L` options, we already join them.
When we
From: Johannes Schindelin
When traversing commits and adjusting the ranges, things can get really
tricky. For example, when the line range of interest encloses several
hunks of a commit, the line range can actually shrink.
Currently, range_set_shift_diff() does not anticipate that scenario and
The patch [https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/commit/4aa8b8c82] that
introduced support for pull --rebase= into the Git for Windows project
still allowed the very convenient abbreviation
git pull --rebase=i
which was later lost when it was ported to the builtin git pull, and it was
not
From: Johannes Schindelin
Git for Windows' original 4aa8b8c8283 (Teach 'git pull' to handle
--rebase=interactive, 2011-10-21) had support for the very convenient
abbreviation
git pull --rebase=i
which was later lost when it was ported to the builtin `git pull`, and
it was not
It was reported via IRC that the exec lines are inserted in the wrong spots
when using --rebase-merges.
The reason is that we used a simple, incorrect implementation that happened
to work as long as the generated todo list only contains pick, fixup and
squash commands. Which is not the case
From: Johannes Schindelin
The --exec option's implementation is not really well-prepared for
--rebase-merges. Demonstrate this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh
From: Johannes Schindelin
The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a fixup/squash chain", i.e. an
exec would not be inserted between a `pick` and any of
From: Johannes Schindelin
The quite useful cSpell extension allows VS Code to have "squiggly"
lines under spelling mistakes. By default, this would add too much
clutter, though, because so much of Git's source code uses words that
would trigger cSpell.
Let's add a few words to make the spell
From: Johannes Schindelin
This adds a couple settings for the .c/.h files so that it is easier to
conform to Git's conventions while editing the source code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
contrib/vscode/init.sh | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Johannes Schindelin
This helps VS Code's intellisense to figure out that we want to include
windows.h, and that we want to define the minimum target Windows version
as Windows Vista/2008R2.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
config.mak.uname | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
[Visual Studio Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/) (nickname "VS Code") is a
light-weight, cross-platform, Open Source development environment, with an
increasingly powerful extension to support C/C++ development. In particular the
intellisense support as well as all the other niceties
From: Johannes Schindelin
When configuring VS Code as core.editor (via `code --wait`), we really
want to adhere to the Git conventions of wrapping commit messages.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
contrib/vscode/init.sh | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Johannes Schindelin
By default, the cSpell extension ignores all files under .git/. That
includes, unfortunately, COMMIT_EDITMSG, i.e. commit messages. However,
spell checking is *quite* useful when writing commit messages... And
since the user hardly ever opens any file inside .git (apart
From: Johannes Schindelin
VS Code is a lightweight but powerful source code editor which runs on
your desktop and is available for Windows, macOS and Linux. Among other
languages, it has support for C/C++ via an extension, which offers to
not only build and debug the code, but also Intellisense,
From: Johannes Schindelin
While it is technically possible, it is confusing. Not only the user,
but also VS Code's intellisense.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
cache.h | 24 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
From: Johannes Schindelin
The C/C++ settings are special, as they are the only generated VS Code
configurations that *will* change over the course of Git's development,
e.g. when a new constant is defined.
Therefore, let's only update the C/C++ settings, also to prevent user
modifications from
From: Johannes Schindelin
Sadly, we do not get all of the definitions via ALL_CFLAGS. Some defines
are passed to GCC *only* when compiling specific files, such as git.o.
Let's just hard-code them into the script for the time being.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
From: Johannes Schindelin
While it is technically possible, it is confusing. Not only the user,
but also VS Code's intellisense.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
cache.h | 24 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
From: Johannes Schindelin
This adds a couple settings for the .c/.h files so that it is easier to
conform to Git's conventions while editing the source code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
contrib/vscode/init.sh | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Johannes Schindelin
The C/C++ settings are special, as they are the only generated VS Code
configurations that *will* change over the course of Git's development,
e.g. when a new constant is defined.
Therefore, let's only update the C/C++ settings, also to prevent user
modifications from
From: Johannes Schindelin
This helps VS Code's intellisense to figure out that we want to include
windows.h, and that we want to define the minimum target Windows version
as Windows Vista/2008R2.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
config.mak.uname | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
From: Johannes Schindelin
By default, the cSpell extension ignores all files under .git/. That
includes, unfortunately, COMMIT_EDITMSG, i.e. commit messages. However,
spell checking is *quite* useful when writing commit messages... And
since the user hardly ever opens any file inside .git (apart
From: Johannes Schindelin
The quite useful cSpell extension allows VS Code to have "squiggly"
lines under spelling mistakes. By default, this would add too much
clutter, though, because so much of Git's source code uses words that
would trigger cSpell.
Let's add a few words to make the spell
From: Johannes Schindelin
When configuring VS Code as core.editor (via `code --wait`), we really
want to adhere to the Git conventions of wrapping commit messages.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
contrib/vscode/init.sh | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git
[Visual Studio Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/) (nickname "VS Code") is a
light-weight, cross-platform, Open Source development environment, with an
increasingly powerful extension to support C/C++ development. In particular the
intellisense support as well as all the other niceties
From: Johannes Schindelin
VS Code is a lightweight but powerful source code editor which runs on
your desktop and is available for Windows, macOS and Linux. Among other
languages, it has support for C/C++ via an extension.
To start developing Git with VS Code, simply run the Unix shell script
From: Johannes Schindelin
Sadly, we do not get all of the definitions via ALL_CFLAGS. Some defines
are passed to GCC *only* when compiling specific files, such as git.o.
Let's just hard-code them into the script for the time being.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
From: Johannes Schindelin
Regression tests are automated tests which try to ensure a specific
behavior. The idea is: if the test case fails, the behavior indicated in
the test case's title regressed.
If a regression test that fails, even occasionally, for any reason other
than to indicate the
This fixes a regression test that produces false positives occasionally:
https://git-for-windows.visualstudio.com/git/_build/results?buildId=14035=logs
Johannes Schindelin (1):
t7406: avoid failures solely due to timing issues
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 6
From: Johannes Schindelin
It *is* a confusing thing to look at a diff of diffs. All too easy is it
to mix up whether the -/+ markers refer to the "inner" or the "outer"
diff, i.e. whether a `+` indicates that a line was added by either the
old or the new diff (or both), or whether the new diff
From: Johannes Schindelin
After using this command extensively for the last two months, this
developer came to the conclusion that even if the dual color mode still
leaves a lot of room for confusion about what was actually changed, the
non-dual color mode is substantially worse in that regard.
From: Johannes Schindelin
When comparing commit messages, we need to keep in mind that they are
indented by four spaces. That is, empty lines are no longer empty, but
have "trailing whitespace". When displaying them in color, that results
in those nagging red lines.
Let's just right-trim the
From: Johannes Schindelin
The bulk of this patch consists of a heavily butchered version of
tbdiff's README written by Thomas Rast and Thomas Gummerer, lifted from
https://github.com/trast/tbdiff.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
Documentation/git-range-diff.txt | 229
From: Johannes Schindelin
The main information in the `range-diff` view comes from the list of
matching and non-matching commits, the diffs are additional information.
Indenting them helps with the reading flow.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
builtin/range-diff.c | 10 ++
1
From: Johannes Schindelin
Just like tbdiff, we now show the diff between matching patches. This is
a "diff of two diffs", so it can be a bit daunting to read for the
beginner.
An alternative would be to display an interdiff, i.e. the hypothetical
diff which is the result of first reverting the
From: Johannes Schindelin
As pointed out by Elijah Newren, tbdiff has this neat little alignment
trick where it outputs the commit pairs with patch numbers that are
padded to the maximal patch number's width:
1: cafedead = 1: acefade first patch
[...]
314: beefeada <
From: Johannes Schindelin
This "color" simply reverts background and foreground. It will be used
in the upcoming "dual color" mode of `git range-diff`, where we will
reverse colors for the -/+ markers and the fragment headers of the
"outer" diff.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
color.h
From: Johannes Schindelin
When displaying a diff of diffs, it is possible that there is an outer
`+` before a context line. That happens when the context changed between
old and new commit. When that context line starts with a tab (after the
space that marks it as context line), our diff
From: Johannes Schindelin
At this stage, `git range-diff` can determine corresponding commits
of two related commit ranges. This makes use of the recently introduced
implementation of the linear assignment algorithm.
The core of this patch is a straight port of the ideas of tbdiff, the
From: Johannes Schindelin
We are comparing complete, formatted commit messages with patches. There
are no function names here, so stop looking for them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
range-diff.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/range-diff.c b/range-diff.c
From: Johannes Schindelin
This change brings `git range-diff` yet another step closer to
feature parity with tbdiff: it now shows the oneline, too, and indicates
with `=` when the commits have identical diffs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
range-diff.c | 64
From: Johannes Schindelin
When diffing diffs, it can be quite daunting to figure out what the heck
is going on, as there are nested +/- signs.
Let's make this easier by adding a flag in diff_options that allows
color-coding the outer diff sign with inverted colors, so that the
preimage and
From: Johannes Schindelin
When showing the diff between corresponding patches of the two branch
versions, we have to make up a fake filename to run the diff machinery.
That filename does not carry any meaningful information, hence tbdiff
suppresses it. So we should, too.
Signed-off-by:
From: Johannes Schindelin
Arguably the most important part of `git range-diff`'s output is the
list of commits in the two branches, together with their relationships.
For that reason, tbdiff introduced color-coding that is pretty
intuitive, especially for unchanged patches (all dim yellow, like
From: Johannes Schindelin
The problem solved by the code introduced in this commit goes like this:
given two sets of items, and a cost matrix which says how much it
"costs" to assign any given item of the first set to any given item of
the second, assign all items (except when the sets have
From: Johannes Schindelin
This command does not do a whole lot so far, apart from showing a usage
that is oddly similar to that of `git tbdiff`. And for a good reason:
the next commits will turn `range-branch` into a full-blown replacement
for `tbdiff`.
At this point, we ignore tbdiff's color
The incredibly useful [`git-tbdiff`](https://github.com/trast/tbdiff) tool to
compare patch series (say, to see what changed between two iterations sent to
the Git mailing list) is slightly less useful for this developer due to the
fact that it requires the `hungarian` and `numpy` Python
From: Johannes Schindelin
Tab completion of `git range-diff` is very convenient, especially
given that the revision arguments to specify the commit ranges to
compare are typically more complex than, say, what is normally passed
to `git log`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
From: Johannes Schindelin
When showing what changed between old and new commits, we show a diff of
the patches. This diff is a diff between diffs, therefore there are
nested +/- signs, and it can be relatively hard to understand what is
going on.
With the --dual-color option, the preimage and
From: Johannes Schindelin
This patch lets `git range-diff` use the same order as tbdiff.
The idea is simple: for left-to-right readers, it is natural to assume
that the `git range-diff` is performed between an older vs a newer
version of the branch. As such, the user is probably more interested
From: Johannes Schindelin
A `git fetch --prune` can turn previously-reachable objects unreachable,
even commits that are in the `shallow` list. A subsequent `git repack
-ad` will then unceremoniously drop those unreachable commits, and the
`shallow` list will become stale. This means that when
From: Johannes Schindelin
While it is true that we never add unreachable commits into pack files
intentionally (as `git repack`'s documentation states), we must not
forget that a `git fetch --prune` (or even a `git fetch` when a ref was
force-pushed in the meantime) can make a commit unreachable
Under certain circumstances, commits that were reachable can be made
unreachable, e.g. via `git fetch --prune`. These commits might have been packed
already, in which case `git repack -adlf` will just drop them without giving
them the usual grace period before an eventual `git prune` (via `git
From: Johannes Schindelin
In 60f487ac0ef (Remove common-cmds.h, 2018-05-10), we forgot to adjust
this README when removing the common-cmds.h file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
compat/vcbuild/README | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
In 60f487ac0ef (Remove common-cmds.h, 2018-05-10), we forgot to adjust
this README when removing the common-cmds.h file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
Johannes Schindelin (1):
vcbuild/README: update to accommodate for missing common-cmds.h
compat/vcbuild/README | 4 ++--
1 file
From: Johannes Schindelin
While it is true that we never add unreachable commits into pack files
intentionally (as `git repack`'s documentation states), we must not
forget that a `git fetch --prune` (or even a `git fetch` when a ref was
force-pushed in the meantime) can make a commit unreachable
Under certain circumstances, commits that were reachable can be made
unreachable, e.g. via `git fetch --prune`. These commits might have been packed
already, in which case `git repack -adlf` will just drop them without giving
them the usual grace period before an eventual `git prune` (via `git
From: Johannes Schindelin
A `git fetch --prune` can turn previously-reachable objects unreachable,
even commits that are in the `shallow` list. A subsequent `git repack
-ad` will then unceremoniously drop those unreachable commits, and the
`shallow` list will become stale. This means that when
From: Johannes Schindelin
Previously, we introduced the `merge` command for use in todo lists,
to allow to recreate and modify branch topology.
For ease of implementation, and to make review easier, the initial
implementation only supported merge commits with exactly two parents.
This patch
The `--rebase-merges` option of `git rebase` generates todo lists that include
the merge commits that are to be rebased.
To keep things simpler to review, I decided to support only regular, 2-parent
merge commits first.
With this patch series, support is extended to cover also octopus merges.
From: Johannes Schindelin
This is consistent with `git commit` which, like `git merge`, supports
passing the commit message via `-m ` and, unlike `git merge` before
this patch, via `-F `.
It is useful to allow this for scripted use, or for the upcoming patch
to allow (re-)creating octopus
From: Johannes Schindelin
Now that we support octopus merges in the `--rebase-merges` mode,
we should give users who actually read the manuals a chance to know
about this fact.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3
From: Johannes Schindelin
This command does not do a whole lot so far, apart from showing a usage
that is oddly similar to that of `git tbdiff`. And for a good reason:
the next commits will turn `range-branch` into a full-blown replacement
for `tbdiff`.
At this point, we ignore tbdiff's color
From: Johannes Schindelin
At this stage, `git range-diff` can determine corresponding commits
of two related commit ranges. This makes use of the recently introduced
implementation of the Hungarian algorithm.
The core of this patch is a straight port of the ideas of tbdiff, the
apparently
From: Johannes Schindelin
When showing what changed between old and new commits, we show a diff of
the patches. This diff is a diff between diffs, therefore there are
nested +/- signs, and it can be relatively hard to understand what is
going on.
With the --dual-color option, the preimage and
From: Johannes Schindelin
When diffing diffs, it can be quite daunting to figure out what the heck
is going on, as there are nested +/- signs.
Let's make this easier by adding a flag in diff_options that allows
color-coding the outer diff sign with inverted colors, so that the
preimage and
201 - 300 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
