On Tuesday 17 July 2012 16:02:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
> > So we want the transport-helper to touch only private refs, i.e. some
> > subdir of refs/, ok.
> > On the other hand I thought we expect git-fetch to update the RHS of the
> > passed refspec (or the def
Hi,
Florian Achleitner wrote:
> So we want the transport-helper to touch only private refs, i.e. some subdir
> of refs/, ok.
> On the other hand I thought we expect git-fetch to update the RHS of the
> passed refspec (or the default one ). How?
Now I am getting confused by terminology. By "th
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 08:48:20 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
> > On Monday 16 July 2012 22:27:25 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Hm, that still doesn't look right. The RHS of the refspec is supposed to
> >> be a _private_ namespace for the remote helper, and refs/remotes/ is
> >
Florian Achleitner wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2012 22:27:25 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Hm, that still doesn't look right. The RHS of the refspec is supposed to
>> be a _private_ namespace for the remote helper, and refs/remotes/ is
>> not private.
[...]
> remote-svn now uses get_fetch_map to retri
On Monday 16 July 2012 22:27:25 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
> > When it does advertise refspec like:
> > Debug: Remote helper: <- refspec
> > refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/svnfile/master it all works. Unfortunatly
> > I didn't understand that a day ago.
>
> Hm, that still d
Florian Achleitner wrote:
> When it does advertise refspec like:
> Debug: Remote helper: <- refspec refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/svnfile/master
> it all works. Unfortunatly I didn't understand that a day ago.
Hm, that still doesn't look right. The RHS of the refspec is supposed to
be a _privat
On Sunday 15 July 2012 19:30:25 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
> > After importing new commits on top of refs/remotes/* the
> > ref was overwritten with the local refs/heads/master, because the name
> > of the remote reference to fetch, i.e. refs/heads/master, w
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
>
>> After importing new commits on top of refs/remotes/* the
>> ref was overwritten with the local refs/heads/master, because the name
>> of the remote reference to fetch, i.e. refs/heads/master, was used to
>> retrieve old_sha1
Hi Florian,
Florian Achleitner wrote:
> After importing new commits on top of refs/remotes/* the
> ref was overwritten with the local refs/heads/master, because the name
> of the remote reference to fetch, i.e. refs/heads/master, was used to
> retrieve old_sha1 for it's local counterpart. Therefo
After importing new commits on top of refs/remotes/* the
ref was overwritten with the local refs/heads/master, because the name
of the remote reference to fetch, i.e. refs/heads/master, was used to
retrieve old_sha1 for it's local counterpart. Therefore, old_sha1 pointed
to the local head which was
10 matches
Mail list logo
