On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jon Seymour wrote:
>
> Is there some reason why this didn't get applied?
I think it's horribly horribly ugly.
I really don't see the point of argument ordering mattering, and I think
the test is broken. Convince me otherwise.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from t
G'day Linus,
Is there some reason why this didn't get applied?
jon.
On 7/5/05, Jon Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A recent change to rev-list altered the order in which start points
> are presented to the merge-order sort algorithm. This caused
> breaks in the t/t6001 unit tests.
>
> T
A recent change to rev-list altered the order in which start points
are presented to the merge-order sort algorithm. This caused
breaks in the t/t6001 unit tests.
This change restores the order in which start points are presented to the
the merge-order sort algorithm (but leaves the order unchang
3 matches
Mail list logo