Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-11-13 Thread Karsten Blees
wn software? -- >8 -- Subject: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance 'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as git

Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-11-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
karsten.bl...@dcon.de writes: > Jeff King wrote on 02.11.2012 16:38:00: > >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: >> >> > Still, I don't think we need to worry about performance regressions, >> > because people who don't have a setup suitable for it will not turn on >> > co

Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-11-13 Thread karsten . blees
Jeff King wrote on 02.11.2012 16:38:00: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > Still, I don't think we need to worry about performance regressions, > > because people who don't have a setup suitable for it will not turn on > > core.preloadindex in the first place. And

Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-11-13 Thread karsten . blees
Jeff King wrote on 02.11.2012 16:26:16: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50:42AM +0100, karsten.bl...@dcon.de wrote: > > > 'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor > > the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as > > git [svn] rebase) s

Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-11-02 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Still, I don't think we need to worry about performance regressions, > because people who don't have a setup suitable for it will not turn on > core.preloadindex in the first place. And if they have it on, the more > places we use it, pr

Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-11-02 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50:42AM +0100, karsten.bl...@dcon.de wrote: > 'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor > the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as > git [svn] rebase) suffer from this, especially on Windows. > > Use read_

Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-10-30 Thread Erik Faye-Lund
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, wrote: > 'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor > the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as > git [svn] rebase) suffer from this, especially on Windows. > > Use read_cache_preload to improve perfo

[PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

2012-10-30 Thread karsten . blees
'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as git [svn] rebase) suffer from this, especially on Windows. Use read_cache_preload to improve performance. Additionally, in builtin/diff.c, don't prel