Re: [PATCH 0/9] transport-helper: updates

2013-09-22 Thread Felipe Contreras
Richard Hansen wrote: > On 2013-08-29 11:23, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Here are the patches that allow transport helpers to be completely > > transparent; > > renaming branches, deleting them, custom refspecs, --force, --dry-run, > > reporting forced update, everything works. > > What is the st

Re: [PATCH 0/9] transport-helper: updates

2013-09-22 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2013-08-29 11:23, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Here are the patches that allow transport helpers to be completely > transparent; > renaming branches, deleting them, custom refspecs, --force, --dry-run, > reporting forced update, everything works. What is the status of these patches? I would like

Re: [PATCH 0/9] transport-helper: updates

2013-08-29 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > >> Some of these were were sent before and rejected without a >> reason,... > > Earlier, you were asked to leave because many constructive criticism > or suggestion for improvement to your patches in reviews led t

Re: [PATCH 0/9] transport-helper: updates

2013-08-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
Felipe Contreras writes: > Some of these were were sent before and rejected without a > reason,... Earlier, you were asked to leave because many constructive criticism or suggestion for improvement to your patches in reviews led to stubborn resistance, ended up wasting everybody's time and left

[PATCH 0/9] transport-helper: updates

2013-08-29 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, Here are the patches that allow transport helpers to be completely transparent; renaming branches, deleting them, custom refspecs, --force, --dry-run, reporting forced update, everything works. Some of these were were sent before and rejected without a reason, but here they are again in case