On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> I do intend to use checkout --to and submodule update on the same
> repository, but have not yet done so. I will poke at that later this
> month. If you can easily reproduce errors, I would appreciate to know
> how, because my us
On ma, 2014-07-07 at 17:25 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > I also have a comment about how it interacts with submodules.
> > Would it be more appropriate to mark "modules" as a
> > per-checkout directory? Because each of the working tree's
> > submodule is obviously a separated directory in filesyste
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Max Kirillov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What future does this have? Currently it is marked as
> "Stalled", but still mergeable with some trivial conflicts
> and seem to be working (except some bugs in interaction with
> submodules, see below). It would be very nice if this
>
Hi.
What future does this have? Currently it is marked as
"Stalled", but still mergeable with some trivial conflicts
and seem to be working (except some bugs in interaction with
submodules, see below). It would be very nice if this
feature is officially supported.
I also have a comment about how
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> The diff against v4 is kinda big but it's mostly about converting
> `...` to $(...) and making git_path() and friends return a const
> string.
>
> Another notable change is I no longer attempt to support checkouts on
> portable devices.
The diff against v4 is kinda big but it's mostly about converting
`...` to $(...) and making git_path() and friends return a const
string.
Another notable change is I no longer attempt to support checkouts on
portable devices. Torsten pointed out (privately) that my dealing with
Windows drives was
6 matches
Mail list logo
