> On 29 Aug 2016, at 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Lars Schneider writes:
>
>>> On 25 Aug 2016, at 21:17, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:07 AM, wrote:
From: Lars
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 19:46, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> larsxschnei...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> diff --git a/t/t0021-conversion.sh b/t/t0021-conversion.sh
>> index 7b45136..34c8eb9 100755
>> --- a/t/t0021-conversion.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0021-conversion.sh
>> @@ -4,6 +4,15 @@
Lars Schneider writes:
>> On 25 Aug 2016, at 21:17, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:07 AM, wrote:
>>> From: Lars Schneider
>>>
>>> Generate more interesting large test
larsxschnei...@gmail.com writes:
> diff --git a/t/t0021-conversion.sh b/t/t0021-conversion.sh
> index 7b45136..34c8eb9 100755
> --- a/t/t0021-conversion.sh
> +++ b/t/t0021-conversion.sh
> @@ -4,6 +4,15 @@ test_description='blob conversion via gitattributes'
>
> . ./test-lib.sh
>
> +if
> On 25 Aug 2016, at 21:17, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:07 AM, wrote:
>> From: Lars Schneider
>>
>> Generate more interesting large test files
>
> How are the large test files more interesting?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:07 AM, wrote:
> From: Lars Schneider
>
> Generate more interesting large test files
How are the large test files more interesting?
(interesting in the notion of covering more potential bugs?
easier to debug? better
From: Lars Schneider
Generate more interesting large test files with pseudo random characters
in between and reuse these test files in multiple tests. Run tests
formerly marked as EXPENSIVE every time but with a smaller data set.
Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider
7 matches
Mail list logo