Le 12 mai 2014 à 21:37, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com a écrit :
Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
It used to work before, on this same repository, since then git and hg were
both upgraded.
In short: The
(Please use reply-all and don't snip the important stuff)
On 2014-05-13 09.54, Charles Brossollet wrote:
Le 12 mai 2014 à 21:37, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com a écrit
:
Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
It
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes:
I did some testing with Git 2.0-rc3 + 58aee0864adeeb5363f.
The remote-helper tests for hg-git worked OK
with both hg version 2.9 and 3.0 under both Mac OS and Linux.
Should we consider 58aee086 to be included in Git 2.0 ?
It is way too late for Git
Junio C Hamano wrote:
It is time to catch regressions by asking wider audiences who do not
normally follow Git development (i.e. those who are not the ones that
follow 'master' and rebuild/install it once or twice a week for their
daily use).
And you have one of those regressions in Git
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes:
I did some testing with Git 2.0-rc3 + 58aee0864adeeb5363f.
The remote-helper tests for hg-git worked OK
with both hg version 2.9 and 3.0 under both Mac OS and Linux.
Should we
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Why do we import changegroup unconditionally, even though it
is only used in the new codepath meant only for version 3.0 or
higher, not inside the if block that decides if we need that
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Why do we import changegroup unconditionally, even though it
is only used in the new codepath meant only for version 3.0 or
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Why do we import changegroup unconditionally, even though it
is only used in the new codepath meant
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:24:51PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
As you say, it's perfectly OK.
But wrong. Yes, it works, but it's not how it should be done when we
have a code review such as
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:24:51PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
As you say, it's perfectly OK.
But wrong. Yes, it works, but it's not how it should be done when we
Hello,
I have the following error while pushing to an hg repository though the remote
translator:
$ git remote -v
origin hg::ssh://charles...@hg.code.sf.net/u/charlesb05/lapdogapi (push)
origin hg::ssh://charles...@hg.code.sf.net/u/charlesb05/lapdogapi (fetch)
$ git push origin
Password:
I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
It used to work before, on this same repository, since then git and hg were
both upgraded.
In short: The remote helper of Git 1.9.3 is not compatible with hg 3.0
You can eiher downgrade hg, or rebuild Git and
Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
It used to work before, on this same repository, since then git and hg were
both upgraded.
In short: The remote helper of Git 1.9.3 is not compatible with hg 3.0
You can eiher downgrade
13 matches
Mail list logo
