On 03/11/2014 10:41 PM, Brad King wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I may be misremembering things, but your first sentence quoted above
was exactly my reaction while reviewing the original change, and I
might have even raised that as an issue
On 03/10/2014 05:38 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
It seems to me that -z input will nearly always be machine-generated,
so there is not much reason to accept the empty string as shorthand for
zeros. So I think that my version of the rules, being simpler to
explain, is a slight improvement.
I
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
It seems to me that -z input will nearly always be machine-generated,
so there is not much reason to accept the empty string as shorthand for
zeros. So I think that my version of the rules, being simpler to
explain, is a slight improvement. But
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I may be misremembering things, but your first sentence quoted above
was exactly my reaction while reviewing the original change, and I
might have even raised that as an issue myself, saying something
like consistency
On 03/10/2014 08:46 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
This test is trying to test a few ways to delete references using git
update-ref -z --stdin. The third line passed in is
update SP /refs/heads/c NUL NUL sha1 NUL
, which is not a correct way to delete a reference according to the
Brad,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 03/10/2014 06:03 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 03/10/2014 08:46 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
This test is trying to test a few ways to delete references using git
update-ref -z --stdin. The third line passed in is
update SP /refs/heads/c NUL NUL sha1 NUL
,
6 matches
Mail list logo