Hi Junio,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Sixt writes:
>
> > Although I am convinced that the change is not necessary for
> > correctness, I can buy the justification that we should produce forward
> > slashes for consistency. There are a number of occasions
Johannes Sixt writes:
> Although I am convinced that the change is not necessary for
> correctness, I can buy the justification that we should produce forward
> slashes for consistency. There are a number of occasions where we
> present paths to the user, and we do show
Am 29.03.2016 um 22:05 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Johannes Sixt writes:
>
>> This part of your 45bf3297 (t1300: fix the new --show-origin tests on
>> Windows)
>>
>> @@ -1205,6 +1205,9 @@ test_expect_success POSIXPERM,PERL 'preserves existing
>> per
>>"die q(badrename)
Am 30.03.2016 um 07:52 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 29.03.2016 um 21:18 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
It does pass. The reason is that pwd -W generates forward slashes.
It just occurred to me that we might be observing a difference in
behavior of pwd -W between the modern MSYS2 bash and the old MSYS1
Am 29.03.2016 um 21:18 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 28.03.2016 um 17:14 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
The problem with your patch is that it does not account for backslashes in
paths resulting in quoting. I am afraid that your patch will most likely
*not* let the tests pass in Git for Windows SDK,
Johannes Sixt writes:
> This part of your 45bf3297 (t1300: fix the new --show-origin tests on
> Windows)
>
> @@ -1205,6 +1205,9 @@ test_expect_success POSIXPERM,PERL 'preserves existing
> per
> "die q(badrename) if ((stat(q(.git/config)))[2] & 0) != 0600"
> '
>
>
Am 28.03.2016 um 17:14 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> A change like this whould have been preferable:
>> [...]
>
> The problem with your patch is that it does not account for backslashes in
> paths resulting in quoting. I am afraid
Hi Hannes,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> A change like this whould have been preferable:
> [...]
The problem with your patch is that it does not account for backslashes in
paths resulting in quoting. I am afraid that your patch will most likely
*not* let the tests pass in Git for
Am 22.03.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> On Windows, the backslash is the native directory separator, but all
> supported Windows versions also accept the forward slash in most
> circumstances.
>
> Our tests expect forward slashes.
>
> Relative paths are generated by Git using
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> > diff --git a/path.c b/path.c
>> > index 8b7e168..969b494 100644
>> > --- a/path.c
>> > +++ b/path.c
>> > @@ -584,6 +584,9 @@ char *expand_user_path(const char *path)
>> >if (!home)
>> >
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > On Windows, the backslash is the native directory separator, but
> > all supported Windows versions also accept the forward slash in
> > most circumstances.
> >
> > Our tests
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> On Windows, the backslash is the native directory separator, but
> all supported Windows versions also accept the forward slash in
> most circumstances.
>
> Our tests expect forward slashes.
>
> Relative paths are generated by Git using
12 matches
Mail list logo