On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 09:59:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> After step 6/7, we no longer "allow cycles in reflog ancestry", as
> >> there will be no reflog ancestry to speak of ;-), so it would be
> >> nice to remove the comment above in that step. But alternatively,
> >> we can
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:54AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
>> > index 8ca1de9894..9c8bb3b5c3 100644
>> > --- a/builtin/log.c
>> > +++ b/builtin/log.c
>> > @@ -374,9 +374,9 @@ static int cmd_log_walk(struct
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:54AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
> > index 8ca1de9894..9c8bb3b5c3 100644
> > --- a/builtin/log.c
> > +++ b/builtin/log.c
> > @@ -374,9 +374,9 @@ static int cmd_log_walk(struct rev_info *rev)
> > if
Jeff King writes:
> When we're doing a reflog walk (instead of walking the
> actual parent pointers), we may see commits multiple times.
> For this reason, we hold on to the commit buffer for each
> commit rather than freeing it after we've showed the commit.
>
> We should do the
4 matches
Mail list logo