Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Hi, On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Marco Costalba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So 'revision' is the struct and 'commit object' the pointer ;-) > > It would be more like "revision" is a concept represented (not > "referenced") by a commit object. Actually, I think it is "refe

Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Hi, On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > [...] > > > By the way, a very good and useful job. Thank you! While I think it is one of the less-fun and less-think jobs, it might be good to have it for people o look it up all the time. > So 'revision' is th

Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Hi, On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote: > > > >> P.S: I say 'revision', and 'git archive' but are very common also > >> 'commit' and 'git repository'. This is just a silly example where a

Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Marco Costalba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>revision:: >> A particular state of files and directories which was stored in >> the object database. It is referenced by a commit object. >> >>commit object:: >> An object which contains the information about a particular >> revisio

Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote: > >> P.S: I say 'revision', and 'git archive' but are very common also >> 'commit' and 'git repository'. This is just a silly example where a >> common dictionary should be useful. I think 'comm

Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Johannes Schindelin wrote: >Hi, > >On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote: > >>P.S: I say 'revision', and 'git archive' but are very common also >>'commit' and 'git repository'. This is just a silly example where a >>common dictionary should be useful. > > >How about the glossary, which I pos

Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Hi, On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote: > P.S: I say 'revision', and 'git archive' but are very common also > 'commit' and 'git repository'. This is just a silly example where a > common dictionary should be useful. How about the glossary, which I posted a few hours ago? Ciao, Dscho -

git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue

Hi, the round trip 1) git-format-patch --mbox --keep-subject 2) git-applymbox -k is not perfect for revisions where there is only the subject. An example is c35a7b8d806317dc1762e36561cbd31c2530dd9c in git archive Original text is: Skip merges in format-patch. After round trip: Ski