On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 02:54:55PM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> > > I have installed the Git software and upon trying to update a
> > > repository by the "open recent repository" link and am unable to
> > > access the menu-or anything-from there. Instead a window pops up with
> > > the
From: "Konstantin Khomoutov"
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:13:05AM -0700, christienne shultz wrote:
I have installed the Git software and upon trying to update a
repository by the "open recent repository" link and am unable to
access the menu-or anything-from there.
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:13:05AM -0700, christienne shultz wrote:
> I have installed the Git software and upon trying to update a
> repository by the "open recent repository" link and am unable to
> access the menu-or anything-from there. Instead a window pops up with
> the following error
Hello,
I have installed the Git software and upon trying to update a
repository by the "open recent repository" link and am unable to
access the menu-or anything-from there. Instead a window pops up with
the following error message:
"\usage C:\Program Files\Git\mingw64/libexec/git-core\git-GUI[
Hi Ada,
On Fri, 5 May 2017, ada wrote:
> I used the command below,there's an error,please help me to solve it !
> Thank you ~
> git push
I am sorry to hear that you encountered a problem using Git.
Having said that, this description does not allow anybody to help you, as
not even the error
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:52:13AM +0800, ada wrote:
> hi,
>
> I used the command below,there's an error,please help me to solve it !
> Thank you ~
> git push
>
>
> Best Regards~
> ada Wang
>
Hello Ada,
In order for people to be able to help you, you should provide more
details about your
hi,
I used the command below,there's an error,please help me to solve it !
Thank you ~
git push
Best Regards~
ada Wang
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors whereas `1` denoted success and `0`
failure. This is unusual for the Git source where
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors whereas `1` denoted success and `0`
failure. This is unusual for the Git source where
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors whereas `1` denoted success and `0`
failure. This is unusual for the Git source where
W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> From: Lars Schneider
>
> apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
> "did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
> the function to track errors whereas `1`
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors whereas `1` denoted success and `0`
failure. This is unusual for the Git source where
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors whereas `1` denoted success and `0`
failure. This is unusual for the Git source where
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors whereas `1` denoted success and `0`
failure. This is unusual for the Git source where
From: Lars Schneider
apply_filter() returns a boolean that tells the caller if it
"did convert or did not convert". The variable `ret` was used throughout
the function to track errors wheras `1` denoted success and `0` failure.
This is unusual for the Git source where
Hi Junio,
On 2015-06-26 19:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I understood what you were saying, but it still appears too fragile to
me to mix functions that assume NUL-terminated strings with an
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
On 2015-06-26 19:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I understood what you were saying, but it still appears too fragile to
me to mix functions
Hi Junio,
On 2015-06-26 00:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
...
If the buffer does *not* contain an empty line, the fsck code runs the
danger of looking beyond the allocated memory because it uses
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I understood what you were saying, but it still appears too fragile to
me to mix functions that assume NUL-terminated strings with an ad-hoc
counted string check.
Yeah, I agree. It is not that you cannot make it safe, but
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I understood what you were saying, but it still appears too fragile to
me to mix functions that assume NUL-terminated strings with an ad-hoc
counted string check.
Yeah, I agree. It is not
Dear Junio,
thanks for the fast replies.
In message xmqqegkzzoaz@gitster.dls.corp.google.com you wrote:
Question is: how can we fix that?
It could be that 4d0d8975 is buggy and barking at a non breakage.
If there is no message in the tag, i.e.
-- 8 --
object
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
Hm... it seems I cannot even easily delte these tags:
- git tag -d LABEL_2006_03_12_0025
Deleted tag 'LABEL_2006_03_12_0025' (was eb394f5)
- git fsck --full
Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
Checking object directories: 100% (256/256),
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
Dear Junio,
thanks for the fast replies.
In message xmqqegkzzoaz@gitster.dls.corp.google.com you wrote:
Question is: how can we fix that?
It could be that 4d0d8975 is buggy and barking at a non breakage.
If there is no message in the tag, i.e.
Hi Junio Wolfgang,
On 2015-06-25 22:24, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
In message xmqqegkzzoaz@gitster.dls.corp.google.com you wrote:
Question is: how can we fix that?
It could be that 4d0d8975 is buggy and barking at a non breakage.
Well, I would like to
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Junio Wolfgang,
On 2015-06-25 22:24, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
In message xmqqegkzzoaz@gitster.dls.corp.google.com you wrote:
Question is: how can we fix that?
It could be that 4d0d8975 is
Hi all,
it turns out that recent versions of git (i. e. git version 2.2.0 or
later, resp. anything which includes commit 4d0d8975 Make sure
fsck_commit_buffer() does not run out of the buffer) throws errors on
our git repository git://git.denx.de/u-boot:
- git fsck --full
Checking object
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
Apparently for some reason the tags LABEL_2006_03_12_0025,
LABEL_2006_04_18_1106, and LABEL_2006_05_19_1133 are missing newlines,
which was undetected so far, but now is raised as an error.
Question is: how can we fix that?
Is there a tool to auto-repair
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
it turns out that recent versions of git (i. e. git version 2.2.0 or
later, resp. anything which includes commit 4d0d8975 Make sure
fsck_commit_buffer() does not run out of the buffer) throws errors on
our git repository git://git.denx.de/u-boot:
- git
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
...
If the buffer does *not* contain an empty line, the fsck code runs the
danger of looking beyond the allocated memory because it uses
functions that assume NUL-terminated strings, while the
Could someone provide me some assistance with troubleshooting the following:
remote: Counting objects: 31654, done.
error: pack-objects died of signal 99568/19585)
error: git upload-pack: git-pack-objects died with error.
fatal: git upload-pack: aborting due to possible repository
corruption
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:40:56PM +, Tom wrote:
Could someone provide me some assistance with troubleshooting the following:
remote: Counting objects: 31654, done.
error: pack-objects died of signal 99568/19585)
The output is smushed here due to the use of \r for the progress
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:49:00PM -0500, Thomas Moretto wrote:
i also have a question concerning large files.
Sure, but let's take it back on-list. Then other people can help answer,
and later users can benefit from seeing the answers.
i ran a check and it said there was a schema.sql file
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 6:51 PM
To: 'git@vger.kernel.org'
Subject: RE: GIt error
Hi,
1.Iam getting error attached when cloning of repository is done:
2.Also, when file is tried to be added,it gives error below:
$ git add *
fatal: unable to stat 'src/development_architecture
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 01:28:30PM +, justin.sathyanat...@accenture.com
wrote:
1.Iam getting error attached when cloning of repository is done:
What error?
2.Also, when file is tried to be added,it gives error below:
$ git add *
fatal: unable to stat
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:28:30 +
justin.sathyanat...@accenture.com wrote:
For Below issue , O/S is Windows7.
[...]
1.Iam getting error attached when cloning of repository is done:
What error?
2.Also, when file is tried to be added,it gives error below:
$ git add *
fatal: unable to stat
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:47:07 +0400
Konstantin Khomoutov kostix+...@007spb.ru wrote:
For Below issue , O/S is Windows7.
1.Iam getting error attached when cloning of repository is done:
What error?
Okay, the Microsoft Word document with two screenshots has been
scrubbed by the list software
36 matches
Mail list logo