Proposal

2018-05-09 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-09 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-04-30 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally i have a business proposal for our mutual benefit please let me know if you are interested. Best Regards, Esentepe Maha

Proposal

2018-04-30 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally i have a business proposal for our mutual benefit please let me know if you are interested. Best Regards, Esentepe Maha

Proposal

2018-04-29 Thread Zeliha Omer faruk
Hello Dear Greetings to you, please I have a very important business proposal for our mutual benefit, please let me know if you are interested. Best Regards, Miss. Zeliha ömer Faruk Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215

Proposal

2018-04-26 Thread MS Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally i have a business proposal for you please reply for more info. Best Regards, Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal

Proposal

2018-04-26 Thread MS Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally i have a business proposal for you please reply for more info. Best Regards, Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal

Proposal

2018-04-26 Thread MS Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally i have a business proposal for you please reply for more info. Best Regards, Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal

Proposal

2018-04-26 Thread MS Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally i have a business proposal for you please reply for more info. Best Regards, Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal

Proposal

2018-04-16 Thread MS Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greeetings to you please did you get my previous email regarding my investment proposal last week friday ? MS.Zeliha ömer faruk zeliha.omer.fa...@gmail.com

business Proposal / Geschäftsvorschlag

2018-04-07 Thread Anders Karlsson
I have a business Proposal for you, contact me directly This business has a cash involvement of $250,000,000.00 Anders Karlsson Ich habe einen Geschäftsvorschlag für Sie, kontaktieren Sie mich direkt Dieses Unternehmen hat eine Beteiligung von $ 250.000.000,00 - [] Anders Karlsson

Proposal

2018-04-01 Thread Melisa Mehmet
Hello Greetings to you today i asked before but i did't get a response please i know this might come to you as a surprise because you do not know me personally so i will give you a video call to explain more but did you get my previous email ? Let me know asap. Best Regards, Miss

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-26 Thread Christian Couder
ror paths, and there are also some memory leaks that we accept when we know that they happen just once and that we are going to exit soon anyway when we should free the memory. >> Ok. Feel free to resend another version of your proposal. > > Sorry for not sending the whole proposal again.

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Paul, On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote: > One thing I did not mention in the previous reply was that I also added > a new paragraph to "Benefits to community" about 'git stash' being slow > on Windows for a lot of users. I consider this alone to be a very good > justificatio

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-25 Thread Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu
in order to avoid any memory leaks. However, to make sure that my code is really leak free, I will use Valgrind, which is already integrated with the testing framework. Ok. Feel free to resend another version of your proposal. Sorry for not sending the whole proposal again. I decided to send o

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-25 Thread Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu
On 23.03.2018 19:06, Johannes Schindelin wrote: [... proposal ...] This is a pretty good proposal. The initial draft at converting `stash list` is a good start (it will need to be converted to avoid spawning an extra process, but that is something we can do incrementally, together). Thank

Proposal

2018-03-25 Thread @Sheng Li Hung
I have a very profitable business for you

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-25 Thread Christian Couder
- >>> in. The result can be found below in text-only version or at the Github >>> link. >> >> I think it would be better if it was sent as a patch (maybe an RFC >> patch) to the mailing list and add the link to the patch email in the >> maling list archive

Re: [RFC v3][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-24 Thread Alban Gruin
Hi, this is the first draft of my proposal. --- ABSTRACT git is a modular source control management software, and all of its subcommands are programs on their own. A lot of them are written in C, but a couple of them are shell or Perl scripts. This is the case of =git-rebase--interactive= (or

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-24 Thread Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu
think it would be better if it was sent as a patch (maybe an RFC patch) to the mailing list and add the link to the patch email in the maling list archive to your proposal. I sent it as a [RFC] patch to the mailing list and included it in the proposal. <https://public-inbox

Re: [RFC] [GSoC] Project proposal: convert scripts to builtins

2018-03-24 Thread Christian Couder
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Pratik Karki wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. Thanks to you, I realized my proposal was > a bit ambitious. Both git-stash and git-rebase are big > commitment. After much analyzing, I found out I cannot complete > both in the given time frame

Re: [RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-24 Thread Christian Couder
Hi, On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Alban Gruin wrote: > Hi, > > here is my second draft of my proposal. As last time, any feedback is > welcome :) > > I did not write my phone number and address here for obvious reasons, > but they will be in the “about me” section

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-23 Thread Christian Couder
ity that will be implemented, but is not strictly related to > git stash will reside in the appropriate files (for example if I had to > implement similar to get_oid, which is not related to git stash, but to > Git, then I would not implement it in stash-helper.c; anyway, I do not > believ

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-23 Thread Johannes Schindelin
list_stash”, which will call “have_stash”. The conversion of these > functions will be made in reverse order they were mentioned (have_stash > first and then list_stash). > > It is very important to know the Git source well in order to avoid > reimplementing functionality. In this case “

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-22 Thread Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu
be promoted to stash.c. Any functionality that will be implemented, but is not strictly related to git stash will reside in the appropriate files (for example if I had to implement similar to get_oid, which is not related to git stash, but to Git, then I would not implement it in stash-helper.c; anyway,

Re: [RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-22 Thread Alban Gruin
Hi, here is my second draft of my proposal. As last time, any feedback is welcome :) I did not write my phone number and address here for obvious reasons, but they will be in the “about me” section of the final proposal. Apart from that, do you think there is something to add? --- ABSTRACT

Re: [RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-21 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Alban, On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Alban Gruin wrote: > Le mardi 20 mars 2018 17:29:28 CET, vous avez écrit : > > > Also, I have a hunch that there is actually almost nothing left to > > rewrite after my sequencer improvements that made it into Git v2.13.0, > > together with the upcoming changes (wh

Re: [RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-21 Thread Alban Gruin
nth, very easily". Is this not accurate anymore? > > So I would like to see more details here... ;-) Yep, I’m working on that. > > Weeks 5 to 9 — June 11, 2018 – July 15, 2018 > > During this period, I would continue to rewrite git-rebase--interactive. > > It would b

Re: [RFC] [GSoC] Project proposal: convert scripts to builtins

2018-03-20 Thread Pratik Karki
Hi Johannes, Thanks for the feedback. Thanks to you, I realized my proposal was a bit ambitious. Both git-stash and git-rebase are big commitment. After much analyzing, I found out I cannot complete both in the given time frame. So, I decided to stick to one and complete it. I decided to stick

Re: [GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-20 Thread Christian Couder
Hi, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote: > > * Convert function: this step is basically makes up the goal of this > project. Could you explain a bit more how you would convert a function? Or could you explain for example how you would convert "git stash list" below?

[GSoC] Convert “git stash” to builtin proposal

2018-03-20 Thread Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu
Hello, I have completed the first draft of my proposal for the Google Summer of Code, which can be found at [1] or below for those who prefer the text version. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks! [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TtdD7zgUsEOszHG5HX1at4zHMDsPmSBYWqy dOPTTpV8/edit

Re: [RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Alban, thank you for your proposal! I will only comment on the parts that I feel could use improvement, the rest is fine by me. On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, Alban Gruin wrote: > APPROXIMATIVE TIMELINE > > Community bonding — April 23, 2018 – May 14, 2018 > During the community bond

Re: [RFC] [GSoC] Project proposal: convert scripts to builtins

2018-03-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
t efforts to turn stash into a builtin: https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/pull/508 and https://public-inbox.org/git/20171110231314.30711-1-j...@teichroeb.net/ It would be good to read up on those and incorporate the learnings into the proposal. > - May 26: Making `b

Re: [RFC] [GSoC] Project proposal: convert scripts to builtins

2018-03-20 Thread Pratik Karki
Hi, This is my draft for my proposal on "Convert Scripts to builtins" for GSoC. Please review and provide feedback. Cheers, Pratik Karki Convert Scripts to builtins === Abstract Many components of Git are still in the form of shell and Perl scripts

Re: [RFC] [GSoC] Project proposal: convert scripts to builtins

2018-03-20 Thread Christian Couder
Hi, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Pratik Karki wrote: > Hi, > This is my draft for my proposal on "Convert Scripts to builtin" for GSoC. > Please review and provide feedbacks. > > https://gist.github.com/prertik/daaa73a39d3ce30811d9a208043dc235 It would be easier

[RFC] [GSoC] Project proposal: convert scripts to builtins

2018-03-20 Thread Pratik Karki
Hi, This is my draft for my proposal on "Convert Scripts to builtin" for GSoC. Please review and provide feedbacks. https://gist.github.com/prertik/daaa73a39d3ce30811d9a208043dc235 Cheers, Pratik Karki

Investment Proposal

2018-03-18 Thread FARDEL Anastasia
Hello Greetings to you and everyone around you please did you get my previous email regarding my proposal ? please let me know if we can work together on this. Best Reagrds Melisa Mehmet

Re: [RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-17 Thread Christian Couder
ning to use the same approach, and describing in your proposal which shell functions you would like to rewrite into the C builtin helper in which order, before planning to fully replace the current git-rebase--interactive. Thanks, Christian.

[RFC][GSoC] Project proposal: convert interactive rebase to C

2018-03-17 Thread Alban Gruin
Hi, here is my first draft of my proposal for the GSoC, about the "convert interactive rebase to C" project. Any feedback is welcome :) --- ABSTRACT git is a modular source control management software, and all of its subcommands are programs on their own. A lot of them are written i

Re: man gittutorial: patch proposal

2018-03-07 Thread kalle
hello. 1.I understood, that verbose commands are quoted in ` ' or ' '. While the points I changed are not verbose commands. Therefore I didn't see any sense in them. Because of the different quoting ways (e.g. `merge`), I thought that someone didn't understand the quoting concept. But it could also

Re: man gittutorial: patch proposal

2018-03-05 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, kalle wrote: > see attachment. Thanks for writing. A few questions: 1. Can you say a little more about the rationale for this change? E.g. is the current formatting sending a confusing message? Is the current formatting intending to use '' as quotes and using italics instead?

man gittutorial: patch proposal

2018-03-05 Thread kalle
see attachment. greetings, kalle >From ed466d29733a14acf3b2071d3d35aa829e09b1d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kalledaballe Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:53:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] I corrected some few quotation mistakes --- Documentation/gittutorial.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions

Proposal

2018-02-21 Thread melisa mehmet
Hello Greetings to you and everyone around you please did you get my previous email regarding my proposal ? please let me know if we can work together on this. Best Reagrds

Proposal

2018-02-21 Thread melisa mehmet
Hello Greetings to you and everyone around you please did you get my previous email regarding my proposal ? please let me know if we can work together on this. Best Reagrds

Proposal

2018-02-21 Thread melisa mehmet
Hello Greetings to you and everyone around you please did you get my previous email regarding my proposal ? please let me know if we can work together on this. Best Reagrds

Proposal

2018-02-21 Thread melisa mehmet
Hello Greetings to you and everyone around you please did you get my previous email regarding my proposal ? please let me know if we can work together on this. Best Reagrds

Proposal

2018-02-21 Thread melisa mehmet
Hello Greetings to you and everyone around you please did you get my previous email regarding my proposal ? please let me know if we can work together on this. Best Reagrds

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Jake, On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Jacob Keller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Psidium Guajava wrote: > > 2018-02-14 22:53 GMT-02:00 Johannes Schindelin : > >> Now, when is the next possible time you can call `git rebase --undo-skip`? > > > > What if the scope were reduced from `--undo-ski

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
ue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Psidium Guajava > >> > wrote: I think this could also be done with > >> > "git rebase --edit-todo", which brings up the right file in your > >> > editor. > >> > >> Yeah that'd would only work if one started a reb

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Paul Tan
Hi Gabriel, On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Psidium Guajava wrote: >> >> Also, a little unrelated with this issue: >> 5. What happened to the rewrite of rebase in C [2]? I couldn't find >> any information after 2016. >> >> [1] https://pub

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-14 Thread Jacob Keller
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Psidium Guajava wrote: > 2018-02-14 22:53 GMT-02:00 Johannes Schindelin : >> Now, when is the next possible time you can call `git rebase --undo-skip`? > > What if the scope were reduced from `--undo-skip` to `--undo-last-skip`? > Also, further reduce the scope to

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-14 Thread Psidium Guajava
2018-02-14 22:53 GMT-02:00 Johannes Schindelin : > Now, when is the next possible time you can call `git rebase --undo-skip`? What if the scope were reduced from `--undo-skip` to `--undo-last-skip`? Also, further reduce the scope to only allow `--undo-last-skip` during a ongoing rebase, not caring

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-14 Thread Jacob Keller
hink this could also be done with "git rebase --edit-todo", which brings >> > up the right file in your editor. >> >> Yeah that'd would only work if one started a rebase as a interactive >> one, not am or merge. > > I agree that the original proposal was c

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-14 Thread Johannes Schindelin
right file in your editor. > > Yeah that'd would only work if one started a rebase as a interactive > one, not am or merge. I agree that the original proposal was clearly for the non-interactive rebase (it talked about .git/rebase-apply/). The biggest problem with the feature requ

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-14 Thread Psidium Guajava
On 2018-02-13 18:42 GMT-02:00 Stefan Beller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Psidium Guajava wrote: > I think this could also be done with "git rebase --edit-todo", which brings > up the right file in your editor. Yeah that'd would only work if one started a rebase as a interactive one

Re: git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-13 Thread Stefan Beller
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Psidium Guajava wrote: > Hello git community, > > I'd like to add a new feature in git-rebase: --undo-skip. > But first, I'd like to consult with the experts if it would be > beneficial for the project and if my line of tought is correct. > > Imagine that you are

git-rebase --undo-skip proposal

2018-02-13 Thread Psidium Guajava
Hello git community, I'd like to add a new feature in git-rebase: --undo-skip. But first, I'd like to consult with the experts if it would be beneficial for the project and if my line of tought is correct. Imagine that you are working on a feature for a long time, but there are multiple bug fixes

Proposal

2018-01-21 Thread Ms Melisa Mehmet
-- Hello i want to invest in your region i have some funds under my management please let me know if we can work together on this investment plan. Regards Melisa Mehmet

Proposal

2018-01-21 Thread Ms Melisa Mehmet
-- Hello i want to invest in your region i have some funds under my management please let me know if we can work together on this investment plan. Regards Melisa Mehmet

Proposal

2018-01-21 Thread Ms Melisa Mehmet
-- Hello i want to invest in your region i have some funds under my management please let me know if we can work together on this investment plan. Regards Melisa Mehmet

Greetings in the name of God, Business proposal in God we trust

2017-11-07 Thread Mrs, Suran Yoda
Greetings in the name of God Dear Friend Greetings in the name of God,please let this not sound strange to you for my only surviving lawyer who would have done this died early this year.I prayed and got your email id from your country guestbook. I am Mrs Suran Yoda from London,I am 72 years old,

Business Proposal.

2017-11-06 Thread Douglas Flint
Dear Friend, I am interested in establishing and operating a very viable business as a means of investment abroad. I do not know too well on how this is done in your country, So I will need you to help me in this regard. My preference is any good profit yielding business and I would appreciate

Greetings in the name of God, Business proposal in God we trust

2017-11-03 Thread Mrs, Suran Yoda
to 14 banking days. This requires a private arrangement; the details of the transaction will be furnished to you if you indicate your interest in this proposal. This money has been dormant for years in our bank without claim, I want the bank to release the money to you as the nearest person (owner o

Greetings in the name of God, Business proposal in God we trust

2017-10-16 Thread Mrs, Suran Yoda
Greetings in the name of God Dear Friend Greetings in the name of God,please let this not sound strange to you for my only surviving lawyer who would have done this died early this year.I prayed and got your email id from your country guestbook. I am Mrs Suran Yoda from London,I am 72 years old,

Project Proposal

2017-10-03 Thread Joseph Taylorl
Dear sir, I am Barrister Joseph Taylor, a legal Solicitor. I was the Personal Attorney and legal adviser to Mr. John ALBIN, a national of your country, who was an expatriate engineer to British Petroleum oil Company. My client, his wife, and their three children were involved in the ill fated Keny

BUSINESS PROPOSAL

2017-09-17 Thread LING LUNG
Please I like you to keep this proposal as a top secret and delete it if you are not interested and get back to me if you are interested for details as regards to the transfer of $24,500,000 to you. This money initially belongs to a Libyan client who died in the libya crisis and had no

BUSINESS PROPOSAL

2017-09-14 Thread LING LUNG
Please I like you to keep this proposal as a top secret and delete it if you are not interested and get back to me if you are interested for details as regards to the transfer of $24,500,000 to you. This money initially belongs to a Libyan client who died in the libya crisis and had no

BUSINESS PROPOSAL

2017-09-13 Thread LING LUNG
Please I like you to keep this proposal as a top secret and delete it if you are not interested and get back to me if you are interested for details as regards to the transfer of $24,500,000 to you. This money initially belongs to a Libyan client who died in the libya crisis and had no

BUSINESS PROPOSAL

2017-09-13 Thread LING LUNG
Please I like you to keep this proposal as a top secret and delete it if you are not interested and get back to me if you are interested for details as regards to the transfer of $24,500,000 to you. This money initially belongs to a Libyan client who died in the libya crisis and had no

Re: fetch-any-blob / ref-in-want proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Orgad Shaneh wrote: > Sorry, I thought it's the same thing. I mean ref-in-want[1]. This > issue in gerrit[2] was closed, claiming that ref-in-want will solve > it. I just want to know if this is likely to be merged soon enough (I > consider several months "soon en

Re: fetch-any-blob / ref-in-want proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Orgad Shaneh
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:41:50 +0300 > Orgad Shaneh wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Jonathan Tan proposed a design and a patch series for requesting a >> specific ref on fetch 4 months ago[1]. >> >> Is there any progress with this? >> >> - Orgad >> >> [1

Re: fetch-any-blob / ref-in-want proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:41:50 +0300 Orgad Shaneh wrote: > Hi, > > Jonathan Tan proposed a design and a patch series for requesting a > specific ref on fetch 4 months ago[1]. > > Is there any progress with this? > > - Orgad > > [1] > https://public-inbox.org/git/ffd92ad9-39fe-c76b-178d-6e3d6a4

fetch-any-blob / ref-in-want proposal

2017-07-22 Thread Orgad Shaneh
Hi, Jonathan Tan proposed a design and a patch series for requesting a specific ref on fetch 4 months ago[1]. Is there any progress with this? - Orgad [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/ffd92ad9-39fe-c76b-178d-6e3d6a425...@google.com/

Re: Proposal

2017-07-17 Thread Elodie Azeez
Hello, Compliment of the day to you. I am Mrs. Elodie, I am sending this brief letter to solicit your partnership to transfer $5.5 million US Dollars into your account for investment in your country. I shall send you more information and procedures when I receive positive response from you. Thank

Re: [RFC PATCH] proposal for refs/tracking/* hierarchy

2017-06-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Marc Branchaud writes: > OTOH, we shouldn't need to do any conflict resolution on these > "tracking" refs: The remote side should update the refs > properly. Nobody should make local changes to these refs. > > I guess I'm advocating that git should only allow "tracking" refs to > be updated by a

Re: [RFC PATCH] proposal for refs/tracking/* hierarchy

2017-06-26 Thread Marc Branchaud
On 2017-06-23 04:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller writes: Instead, lets add support for a new refs/tracking/* hierarchy which is laid out in such a way to avoid this inconsistency. All refs in "refs/tracking//*" will include the complete ref, such that dropping the "tracking/" part wi

Re: [RFC PATCH] proposal for refs/tracking/* hierarchy

2017-06-23 Thread Jacob Keller
e "wip" tag means in the >project globally. > > For the former, I expect that merging these non-working tree > contents will all have to require some specific tool that is > tailored for the meaning each hierarchy has, just like "git notes > merge" gives a solu

Re: [RFC PATCH] proposal for refs/tracking/* hierarchy

2017-06-23 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jacob Keller writes: > Instead, lets add support for a new refs/tracking/* hierarchy which is > laid out in such a way to avoid this inconsistency. All refs in > "refs/tracking//*" will include the complete ref, such that > dropping the "tracking/" part will give the exact ref name as it > is fou

Re: [RFC PATCH] proposal for refs/tracking/* hierarchy

2017-06-23 Thread Jacob Keller
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Jacob Keller wrote: > From: Jacob Keller > > Historically, git has tracked the status of remote branches (heads) in > refs/remotes//*. This is necessary and useful as it allows users > to track the difference between their local work and the last known > status of

[RFC PATCH] proposal for refs/tracking/* hierarchy

2017-06-23 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller Historically, git has tracked the status of remote branches (heads) in refs/remotes//*. This is necessary and useful as it allows users to track the difference between their local work and the last known status of the remote work. Unfortunately this hierarchy is limited in tha

Re: proposal for how to share other refs as part of refs/tracking/*

2017-06-13 Thread Jacob Keller
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Marc Branchaud wrote: > On 2017-06-13 10:41 AM, Marc Branchaud wrote: >> >> >> So I like your refs/tracking proposal, and hope that it aims for mirroring >> a remote's refs, to eventually replace refs/remotes entirely. > > &

Re: proposal for how to share other refs as part of refs/tracking/*

2017-06-13 Thread Marc Branchaud
On 2017-06-13 10:41 AM, Marc Branchaud wrote: So I like your refs/tracking proposal, and hope that it aims for mirroring a remote's refs, to eventually replace refs/remotes entirely. To be extra-clear: I think a refs/tracking hierarchy that starts with notes and maybe some other bits

Re: proposal for how to share other refs as part of refs/tracking/*

2017-06-13 Thread Marc Branchaud
n refs/* hierarchy (well, within reason -- I think there are limits to what should be mirrored). So I like your refs/tracking proposal, and hope that it aims for mirroring a remote's refs, to eventually replace refs/remotes entirely. M. For example, if Alice creates a n

proposal for how to share other refs as part of refs/tracking/*

2017-06-12 Thread Jacob Keller
Hi, There's no actual code yet, (forgive me), but I've been thinking back to a while ago about attempting to find a way to share things like refs/notes, and similar refs which are usually not shared across a remote. By default, those refs are not propagated when you do a push or a pull, and this

Good day I write to you in hope that you will be open minded to consider a business partnership proposal in transaction deal worth millions. All I require from you is honesty and an assurance that you

2017-06-10 Thread Ben Moore

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-04 Thread Jonathan Tan
d and we are striking a balance between performance and strictness with such an understanding of the implications, I am perfectly fine with the proposal. That is why my comment has never been "I think that is wrong" but consistently was "I wonder if that is a good thing." Thanks. Noted - if/when I update the patch, I'll include this information in.

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
is understood and we are striking a balance between performance and strictness with such an understanding of the implications, I am perfectly fine with the proposal. That is why my comment has never been "I think that is wrong" but consistently was "I wonder if that is a good thing." Thanks.

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-02 Thread Jonathan Tan
On 05/02/2017 11:32 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jonathan Tan writes: On 05/01/2017 04:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jonathan Tan writes: Thanks for your comments. If you're r

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-02 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jonathan Tan writes: >> >>> On 05/01/2017 04:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jonathan Tan writes: > Thanks for your comments. If you're referring to the codepath > invol

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-02 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Tan writes: > >> On 05/01/2017 04:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> Jonathan Tan writes: >>> Thanks for your comments. If you're referring to the codepath involving write_sha1_file() (for example, builtin/hash-object -> >>

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Tan writes: > On 05/01/2017 04:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jonathan Tan writes: >> >>> Thanks for your comments. If you're referring to the codepath >>> involving write_sha1_file() (for example, builtin/hash-object -> >>> index_fd or builtin/unpack-objects), that is fine because >>>

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-01 Thread Brandon Williams
On 05/01, Jonathan Tan wrote: > On 05/01/2017 04:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >Jonathan Tan writes: > > > >>Thanks for your comments. If you're referring to the codepath > >>involving write_sha1_file() (for example, builtin/hash-object -> > >>index_fd or builtin/unpack-objects), that is fine bec

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-01 Thread Jonathan Tan
On 05/01/2017 04:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jonathan Tan writes: Thanks for your comments. If you're referring to the codepath involving write_sha1_file() (for example, builtin/hash-object -> index_fd or builtin/unpack-objects), that is fine because write_sha1_file() invokes freshen_packed_o

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Tan writes: > Thanks for your comments. If you're referring to the codepath > involving write_sha1_file() (for example, builtin/hash-object -> > index_fd or builtin/unpack-objects), that is fine because > write_sha1_file() invokes freshen_packed_object() and > freshen_loose_object() dire

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-05-01 Thread Jonathan Tan
On 04/30/2017 08:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: One thing I wonder is what the performance impact of a change like this to the codepath that wants to see if an object does _not_ exist in the repository. When creating a new object by hashing raw data, we see if an object with the same name already

Re: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-04-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Tan writes: > In order to determine the code changes in sha1_file.c necessary, I > investigated the following: > (1) functions in sha1_file that take in a hash, without the user > regarding how the object is stored (loose or packed) > (2) functions in sha1_file that operate on pac

Re: Proposal for "fetch-any-blob Git protocol" and server design

2017-04-26 Thread Jonathan Tan
hem before allowing the actual command to start"), so a Git command would typically make a single request that contains all the blobs required, but my proposal can also handle (1c) ('"fault" them in as necessary in read_object() while the command is running and without any pre-

Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos

2017-04-26 Thread Jonathan Tan
Here is a proposal for missing blob support in Git repos. There have been several other proposals [1] [2]; this is similar to those except that I have provided a more comprehensive analysis of the changes that need to be done, and have made those changes (see commit below the scissors line). This

RE: Proposal for "fetch-any-blob Git protocol" and server design

2017-04-21 Thread Kevin David
e-fetch them before > allowing the actual command to start"), so a Git command would typically > make a single request that contains all the blobs required, but my > proposal can also handle (1c) ('"fault" them in as necessary in > read_object() while the comman

Business Proposal

2017-04-16 Thread QUATIF GROUP OF COMPANIES
Dear Friend, I would like to discuss a very important issue with you. I am writing to find out if this is your valid email. Please, let me know if this email is valid Kind regards Adrien Saif Attorney to Quatif Group of Companies

<    1   2   3   4   5   >