Hi,
When running `git fetch` it returns every time the same 100+ branches
that didn't change at all but still specifies them as new branches in
the server. It also prints the branches that did change.
I don't see this behavior in other repositories I contribute. how do I fix it?
The same output
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:17:24AM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > The other major user of that feature I can think of is LFS. There Git
> > ends up diffing the LFS pointers, not the big files. Which arguably is
> > the wrong thing (you'd prefer to see the actual file contents diffed),
Registration is now open for the Contributor Summit at Git Merge. To
recap from my earlier announcement[1]:
When: Thursday, January 31, 2019. 10am-5pm.
Where: The Egg[2], Brussels, Belgium
What: Round-table discussion about Git
Who: All contributors to Git or related projects in the Git
fuzz-commit-graph identified a case where Git will read past the end of
a buffer containing a commit graph if the graph's header has an
incorrect chunk count. A simple bounds check in parse_commit_graph()
prevents this.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
---
commit-graph.c | 14
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 6b72f37c29..bbcfc2bc9f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ cover_db_html: cover_db
# An example command to build against libFuzzer from
Currently when git-fetch is asked to recurse into submodules, it dispatches
a plain "git-fetch -C " (with some submodule related options
such as prefix and recusing strategy, but) without any information of the
remote or the tip that should be fetched.
But this default fetch is not sufficient, as
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 07:38:08PM +0100, Martin Ågren wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> [...]
>
> This idea was floated a couple of months ago [1]. Junio seemed to find
> the request sensible and outlined a design. No patches materialized, as
> far as I know, but that could be because Eric suggested a
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jeff King wrote:
> The model that fits more naturally with how Git is implemented would be
> to use submodules. There you leak the hash of the commit from the
> private submodule, but that's probably obscure enough (and if you're
> really worried, you can add a random
On Thu, 06 Dec 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:02 AM Yaroslav Halchenko
> wrote:
> > Dear Git Gurus,
> > I wondered what would be your take on my wishlist request to add
> > --reset-hard option, which would be very similar to regular "update" which
> > checks out
In the codebase, "prune" is a highly overloaded term, and it caused me a
lot of trouble to figure out what it meant when it was used in the
context of path limiting. Stop using the word "prune" when we really
mean "path limiting."
Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore
---
Add a new fuzz test for the commit graph and fix a buffer read-overflow
that it discovered. Additionally, fix the Makefile instructions for
building fuzzers.
Changes since V1:
* Moved the parse_commit_graph() declaration to the header file, since
we don't mind if others use it.
* Moved
Breaks load_commit_graph_one() into a new function,
parse_commit_graph(). The latter function operates on arbitrary buffers,
which makes it suitable as a fuzzing target. Since parse_commit_graph()
is only called by load_commit_graph_one() (and the fuzzer described
below), we omit error messages
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:09 PM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > The model that fits more naturally with how Git is implemented would be
> > to use submodules. There you leak the hash of the commit from the
> > private submodule, but that's
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hey
n8541112.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Also CC-ing Stolee since I mention multi-pack indices at the end.
> This seems like a reasonable thing to do, but I have sort of a
> meta-comment. In several places we've started doing this kind of "if
> it's this type of object, do X, otherwise do Y" optimization (e.g.,
> handling large blobs
Konstantin Khomoutov writes:
>> I do not see why the "name each rev relative to HEAD" formatting
>> option cannot produce HEAD^2~2 etc.
>> ...
> My reading was that the OP explicitly wanted to just glance at a single
> integer number and use it right away in a subsequent rebase command.
>
> I
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:25 PM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:02 AM Yaroslav Halchenko
> > wrote:
>
> > > Dear Git Gurus,
>
> > > I wondered what would be your take on my wishlist request to add
> > > --reset-hard
Hello, Jeff.
So, this is what I currently have. It still does the same thing but a
lot more generic in terms of both interface and implementation.
* All core logics are implemented as core helpers / features.
* Trailer parsing and reverse-mapping in trailer_rev_xrefs_*().
* Note refs
> > The git command line expects Git servers to follow a specific order of
>
> "Command line"? It sounds like you are talking about the order of
> command line arguments and options, but apparently that is not what
> you are doing. Is it "The git over-the-wire protocol"?
I meant to say the
Johannes,
Thanks for your feedback.
I'm not looking closely at submodules, as it's my understanding that
VFSForGit does not support them. A VFS would be a killer feature for us.
If VFSForGit were to support submodules, we'd look at them. They would
provide access control in a way that's
> > +This feature allows servers to serve part of their packfile response as
> > URIs.
> > +This allows server designs that improve scalability in bandwidth and CPU
> > usage
> > +(for example, by serving some data through a CDN), and (in the future)
> > provides
> > +some measure of
hi everybody,
I am the maintainer of cregit. We are trying to improve blame
traceability at the token level (see
https://github.com/dmgerman/papers/blob/master/editorials/cregit/cregit.org)
We use git-blame heavilty in cregit. One of the features that I
would like to add to cregit is the
> Jonathan Tan writes:
>
> > @@ -126,6 +129,12 @@ static int read_pack_objects_stdout(int outfd, struct
> > output_state *os)
> > }
> > os->used += readsz;
> >
> > + if (!os->packfile_started) {
> > + os->packfile_started = 1;
> > + if (use_protocol_v2)
> > +
> > This is on sb/more-repo-in-api because I'm using the repo_parse_commit()
> > function.
>
> This is a mere nicety, not strictly required.
> Before we had parse_commit(struct commit *) which would accomplish the
> same, (and we'd still have that afterwards as a #define falling back onto
>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:36:26PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> The signal interrupts the first wait.
Ah, of course. I'm ashamed to say that this is not the first time I
forget about that...
> > Bash 4.3 or later are strange: I get back the shell prompt immediately
> > after ctrl-C as well, so it
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:10 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
> > This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip,
> > with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it
> > without range-diff, but would ask for full review.
>
> Is that a "resend" or
Hi William,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 07:38:08PM +0100, Martin Ågren wrote:
> > Hi William,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > This idea was floated a couple of months ago [1]. Junio seemed to find
> > the request sensible and outlined a design. No patches
Good Day Dear,
I'm Ms Amelia and am new here looking for a serious relationship with someone i
can spend the rest of my life with, someone who is loving, caring, honest and
faithful to spend the rest of my life with, i came across your profile and its
very interesting to me and i would like
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:30 PM Lukáš Krejčí wrote:
>
> I am talking about `git bisect replay`. The shell script, as far as I
> can see, only updates the references (ref/bisect/*) and never checks if
> the revisions marked as 'good' are ancestors of the 'bad' one.
> Therefore,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:56:21PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> Could we just kill them all?
>
> I guess it's a little tricky, because $! is going to give us the pid of
> each subshell. We actually want to kill the test sub-process. That takes
> a few contortions, but the output is nice (every
On Thu, Dec 06 2018, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:08:57AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King writes:
>>
>> > In my opinion this feature is so contrary to Git's general assumptions
>> > that it's likely to create a ton of information leaks of the supposedly
>> >
Hi,
When running "git add -p" on git version 2.19.2 and "diff.noprefix" set
to true, it still shows the "a/" and "b/" prefixes.
This issue has been reported in 2016 already[1], but is still there in
2.19.2.
[1]
https://public-inbox.org/git/e1d7329a-a54b-4d09-a72a-62eca8005...@gmail.com/T/
--
Hello!
> Yeah, it does look indirect. Despite what you said, it also would
> support users giving an absolute path via GITWEB_CONFIG.
>
> With "use File::Spec", perhaps something like this?
Yes, this looks right.
Martin
Hi,
thanks for your great work! Just two remarks:
#: midx.c:407
-#, fuzzy, c-format
+#, c-format
msgid "failed to add packfile '%s'"
-msgstr "Fehler beim Lesen der Reihenfolgedatei '%s'."
+msgstr "Fehler beim Hinzufügen von Packdatei'%s'."
A Space is missing: "Fehler beim Hinzufügen von
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:56:01PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > +test_expect_success 'roll those dice' '
> > + case "$(openssl rand -base64 1)" in
> > + z*)
> > + return 1
> > + esac
> > +'
>
> Wasteful :)
>
> test $(($$ % 42)) -ne 0
Oh, indeed, that is much more clever. :)
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 12:10:05AM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:56:21PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> > Could we just kill them all?
> >
> > I guess it's a little tricky, because $! is going to give us the pid of
> > each subshell. We actually want to kill the test
Jonathan Tan writes:
>> Jonathan Tan writes:
>>
>> > @@ -126,6 +129,12 @@ static int read_pack_objects_stdout(int outfd, struct
>> > output_state *os)
>> >}
>> >os->used += readsz;
>> >
>> > + if (!os->packfile_started) {
>> > + os->packfile_started = 1;
>> > + if
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the dialogue! Replies are embedded below.
On Thu, 06 Dec 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> ...
> > > What if the branch differs from the sha1 recorded in the superproject?
> > git reset --hard itself is an operation which should be done with some
> > level of competence in
On 2018.11.28 16:27, Stefan Beller wrote:
> This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip,
> with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it
> without range-diff, but would ask for full review.
>
> I plan on resending after the next release as this got delayed
Let's ignore how bad this patch is for git.git, and just focus on how
diff.colorMoved treats it:
diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c
index f65c172299..d1155322ef 100644
--- a/builtin/add.c
+++ b/builtin/add.c
@@ -6,5 +6,3 @@
#include "cache.h"
-#include
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:31:36AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> It would be great if git-log has a formatting option to insert an
> >> index of the current commit since HEAD.
> >>
> >> It would allow after quitting the git-log to immediately fire up "git
> >> rebase -i HEAD~index" instead
--
ATTENTION
I want you to contact
Fast Courier Express & Logistics
so that swill send you the ATM card fast. mind you that as soon as you
received your ATM card you have to be taking 5000 dollars every day
until the
total amount of your fund which is 3,8 million dollars okay contact
them
The section used to discussed $gitweb_export_ok and $gitweb_list, but
gitweb Perl code does not have such variables (this likely hangs over
from GITWEB_EXPORT_OK and GITWEB_LIST respectively). Fix the section to
spell $export_ok and $projects_list like the rest of the document.
Signed-off-by:
On 12/5/2018 5:32 PM, Josh Steadmon wrote:
+ if (chunk_lookup + GRAPH_CHUNKLOOKUP_WIDTH > data + graph_size) {
+ error(_("chunk lookup table entry missing; graph file may be
incomplete"));
+ free(graph);
+ return NULL;
+
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:07:00PM -0800, biswaranjan panda wrote:
> Thanks! Strangely git log --follow does work.
I suspect it would work even without --follow. When you limit a log
traversal with a pathspec, like:
git log foo
that is not about following some continuous stream of content,
I have the following scenario:
On a branch A, I deleted a file foo.txt and committed the change. Then
I did a bunch of other changes.
Now I want to undelete foo.txt.
One way is to checkout a separate branch B where the file is present.
Then checkout A. Then do
git checkout B -- path_to_file
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:26 PM Jeff King wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:07:00PM -0800, biswaranjan panda wrote:
>
> > Thanks! Strangely git log --follow does work.
>
> I suspect it would work even without --follow. When you limit a log
> traversal with a pathspec, like:
>
> git log foo
Hi,
I have set my UI font in the git-gui preferences, but it only affects
the menus and certain widgets. It does not apply the font to labels
and buttons. This creates a problem for my HiDPI display because the
fonts are quite small. I've never programmed in TCL/TK before so I
don't know
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:49 PM biswaranjan panda
wrote:
>
> I have the following scenario:
>
> On a branch A, I deleted a file foo.txt and committed the change. Then
> I did a bunch of other changes.
> Now I want to undelete foo.txt.
>
> One way is to checkout a separate branch B where the file
Thanks! Strangely git log --follow does work.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:55 PM Bryan Turner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:49 PM biswaranjan panda
> wrote:
> >
> > I have the following scenario:
> >
> > On a branch A, I deleted a file foo.txt and committed the change. Then
> > I did a bunch
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:43 PM Lukáš Krejčí wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> after looking into this today, I'm not sure if this can be considered a
> bug - it's just that I expected Git to check out the exact commit to
> test that was there before resetting the bisect. That made me uncertain
>
We indent with TABs and sometimes for fine alignment, TABs followed by
spaces, but never all spaces (unless the indentation is less than 8
columns). Indenting with spaces slips through in some places. Fix
them.
Imported code and compat/ are left alone on purpose. The former should
remain as close
Dear Git Gurus,
I wondered what would be your take on my wishlist request to add
--reset-hard option, which would be very similar to regular "update" which
checks out necessary commit, but I want it to remain in the branch.
Rationale: In DataLad we heavily rely on submodules, and we have
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:58 AM Phillip Wood wrote:
> > So is there some "must be at least two consecutive lines" condition for
> > not-plain, or is something else going on here?
>
> To be considered a block has to have 20 alphanumeric characters - see
> commit f0b8fb6e59 ("diff: define block by
Hi all,
We are in a situation where we would like to use author information that is
different from committer information when we commit to certain
repositories.
Currently, it looks like there are two ways to do this, and I'm not sure
how to make either of them work well.
There are the
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 17:31 +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> > When Git replays the bisect log, it only updates refs/bisect/bad,
> > refs/bisect/good-*, refs/bisect/skip-* and reconstructs the log in
> > .git/BISECT_LOG. After that check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad() verifies
> > that all good
Hello,
I am trying to understand how a fix from a bug-correction branch vanished and
the bug found its way back into the main branch after two merges.
I am using git version 2.19.2.
Checkouting tag 18.40.1 and checking its graph:
> $ git checkout 18.40.1
>
> $ git log --oneline --graph
Hello again,
after looking into this today, I'm not sure if this can be considered a
bug - it's just that I expected Git to check out the exact commit to
test that was there before resetting the bisect. That made me uncertain
whether Git restored the correct state.
When I looked at what Git
Hi Ævar
On 06/12/2018 13:54, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Let's ignore how bad this patch is for git.git, and just focus on how
diff.colorMoved treats it:
diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c
index f65c172299..d1155322ef 100644
--- a/builtin/add.c
+++
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:02 AM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> Dear Git Gurus,
>
> I wondered what would be your take on my wishlist request to add
> --reset-hard option, which would be very similar to regular "update" which
> checks out necessary commit, but I want it to remain in the branch.
Hi William,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 19:18, William Hubbs wrote:
> We are in a situation where we would like to use author information that is
> different from committer information when we commit to certain
> repositories.
[...]
> [...] I would like to propose the addition of author.email and
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:56 PM Jacob Keller wrote:
> Personally, I would rather err on the side which requires the least
> interaction from users to avoid silently clobbering an ignored file.
>
> Either Duy's solution with a sort of "untracked" reflog, or the
> garbage/trashable notion.
The
Am 06.12.18 um 01:58 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Frank Schäfer writes:
>
>> Just to be sure that I'm not missing anything here:
>> What's your definition of "LF in repository, CRLF in working tree" in
>> terms of config parameters ?
> :::Documentation/config/core.txt:::
>
> core.autocrlf::
>
63 matches
Mail list logo
