Hi everyone,
I have a large Git project which I would like to dissect into
subprojects with their own repositories. Git subtrees are ideal for
this task: I first
* create a branch with the contents of only one subfoldergit subtree
split -P name-of-folder -b name-of-new-branch
and then
* pull
Hi,
I tried to compile git 2.4.3 using root on a server. It failed on test
41 of t0302-credential-store.sh
In fact even if we remove read access on a directory, root still can
acces this directory.
Using a not privilegied user make the test work.
Perhaps the test should be adapted to this
Am 11.06.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Augie Fackler:
When developing server software, it's often helpful to save a
potentially-bogus pack for later analysis. This makes that trivial,
instead of painful.
When you develop server software, shouldn't you test drive the server
via the bare metal protocol
I was surprised to see that when using git-init, if the template folder
is itself a symlink, then the contents of the template is NOT copied to
the resulting git repository, but instead each individual file is
symlinked.
For my particular use case, this is undesirable (since if I am not
careful,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Panagiotis Astithas past...@gmail.com
wrote:
The output of pmset -g batt changed at some point from
Currently drawing from 'AC Power' to the slightly different
Now drawing from 'AC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
After digging the code I may have got a clue where to start but I
would still appreciate some help from a developer, cause I have never
learned to write C. (Some basics at school which happened over a
decade ago.)
Currently I have
When --patch or pathspecs are passed to git checkout, the working tree
will not be switching branch, so there's no need to check if the branch
that we are running checkout on is already checked out.
Original-patch-by: Spencer Baugh sba...@catern.com
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Hello git devs,
I'm toying with an idea of an improvement I would like to work on, but
not sure if it would be desirable enough to be considered good to merge
in the end, so I'm requesting your opinions before I work on it.
AFAIU git stores the contents of a repo as a sequence of patches in
On vr, 2015-06-12 at 13:39 +0200, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
On 12/06/15 13:33, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
On vr, 2015-06-12 at 13:26 +0200, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
AFAIU git stores the contents of a repo as a sequence of patches in the
.git metadata folder.
It does not, it stores
On 12/06/15 13:33, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
On vr, 2015-06-12 at 13:26 +0200, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
AFAIU git stores the contents of a repo as a sequence of patches in the
.git metadata folder.
It does not, it stores full snapshots of files.
In bare repos too?
1. `git clone
Hi,
I am bisecting the kernel tree between v3.17 and v3.18, and 'git describe'
is used by the kernel compilation process. Why do I get a version
v3.17-rc7-1626-ga4b4a2b, that seems outside of [v3.17..v3.18] ?
To reproduce :
git bisect start
git bisect bad v3.18
git bisect good v3.17
Bisecting:
Philippe De Muyter p...@macq.eu writes:
I am bisecting the kernel tree between v3.17 and v3.18, and 'git describe'
is used by the kernel compilation process. Why do I get a version
v3.17-rc7-1626-ga4b4a2b, that seems outside of [v3.17..v3.18] ?
Because your are testing a side branch that is
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Jean-Yves LENHOF
jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org wrote:
Hi,
I tried to compile git 2.4.3 using root on a server. It failed on test 41 of
t0302-credential-store.sh
In fact even if we remove read access on a directory, root still can acces
this directory.
Using a not
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:39:01PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
- if (starts_with(buf, PACK) || starts_with(buf + 1, PACK)) {
+ if (starts_with(buf, PACK) || starts_with(buf, \1PACK)) {
This answers the question on
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:39:01PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
- if (starts_with(buf, PACK) || starts_with(buf + 1, PACK)) {
+ if (starts_with(buf, PACK) || starts_with(buf, \1PACK)) {
This answers the question on the previous patch actually, maybe the
code could be improved
Mike Rappazzo rappa...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
...
The autosquash part somehow makes me feel uneasy, though. The
feature fundamentally has to have %s as the first thing in the
format to work, but by making the format
On 13/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
Git should fail to clone if trying to clone from an non-existing
ref namespace, since it's the same as a non-existing repository
Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com
---
Changes since v1:
* Fixed the namespace check, since I apparently
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:00:05PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
When I added GIT_TRACE_PACKET long ago, I had always intended to
follow-up with a GIT_TRACE_PACKFILE. The former stops tracing when we
get to the binary data, but I had intended the latter to store the pure
on-the-wire packfile
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
To find the start of the pack data, we accept the word PACK
at the beginning of any sideband channel, even though what
we really want is to find the pack data on channel 1. In
practice this doesn't matter, as sideband-2 messages
Git should fail to clone if trying to clone from an non-existing
ref namespace, since it's the same as a non-existing repository
Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com
---
In version 4 of the ArchLinux User Repository, which is a hosting
platform for recepies for building Arch
Michael Rappazzo rappa...@gmail.com writes:
A config option 'rebase.instructionFormat' can override the
default 'oneline' format of the rebase instruction list.
Since the list is parsed using the left, right or boundary mark plus
the sha1, they are prepended to the instruction format.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
But because you overwrite the $message variable you read from the
original insn sheet (which uses the custom format) and compute $rest
based on the default %s and store that in $1.sq, lines in
$1.sq do not know anything
Git should fail to clone if trying to clone from an non-existing
ref namespace, since it's the same as a non-existing repository
Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com
---
Changes since v1:
* Fixed the namespace check, since I apparently forgot to check with a
bare repo in my
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
I think it is needed later when struct ref_sort is moved into
ref-filter.h, because then the used_atom[] array is not moved.
Now I am confused. used_atom[] is the mechanism we use to give a
small integer to each atom used in the
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes:
It can be useful to have grafts or replace refs for specific use-cases while
keeping the default view of the repository pristine (or with a different
set of grafts/replace refs).
It is possible to use a different graft file with GIT_GRAFT_FILE, but while
When debugging the pack protocol, it is sometimes useful to
store the verbatim pack that we sent or received on the
wire. Looking at the on-disk result is often not helpful for
a few reasons:
1. If the operation is a clone, we destroy the repo on
failure, leaving nothing on disk.
2. If
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
We carefully check that our pkt buffer has enough characters
before seeing if it starts with PACK. The intent is to
avoid reading random memory if we get a short buffer like
PAC.
However, we know that the traced packets are
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:14:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
While I did run the tests between each commit, I hadn't noticed they
were failing because I don't have Apache installed on my laptop, so they
were silently skipped. I'll
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
When --patch or pathspecs are passed to git checkout, the working tree
will not be switching branch, so there's no need to check if the branch
that we are running checkout on is already checked out.
Yeah, I agree that having this check in
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes:
It can be useful to have grafts or replace refs for specific use-cases while
keeping the default view of the repository pristine (or with a different
set of grafts/replace refs).
It is possible to use a
It only needs the '%s' for the autosquash when the todo/instruction
list order is determined. For this, in the rearrange_squash function,
it will re-calculate the message:
+ test -z ${format} || message=$(git log -n 1
--format=%s ${sha1})
Additionally, it may also rerun the log
We carefully check that our pkt buffer has enough characters
before seeing if it starts with PACK. The intent is to
avoid reading random memory if we get a short buffer like
PAC.
However, we know that the traced packets are always
NUL-terminated. They come from one of these sources:
1. A
To find the start of the pack data, we accept the word PACK
at the beginning of any sideband channel, even though what
we really want is to find the pack data on channel 1. In
practice this doesn't matter, as sideband-2 messages tend to
start with error: or similar, but it is a good idea to be
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
While I did run the tests between each commit, I hadn't noticed they
were failing because I don't have Apache installed on my laptop, so they
were silently skipped. I'll resubmit with that fixed.
It is somewhat strange that _only_ http
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:20:45PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Notice GitHub prints remote: fatal: pack exceeds maximum allowed
size. That interrupted my Writing objects progress meter, and then
git push just kept going and wrote really really fast (170 MiB/s!)
until the entire pack was
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 2015-06-08 20:34, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Based on a cursory review of the git code I get the impression that
GNU diff and git 'diff' do not share any code for the possible diff
algorithms.
The latest patch series LGTM. It's a pity about the more complicated
structure with two different ways to query the changes list, but it
does look hard to make it any simpler.
Lex Spoon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
On 2015-06-12 06.49, Scott Schmit wrote:
'git checkout' with paths or `--patch` is used to restore modified or
deleted paths to their original contents from the index or replace paths
with the contents from a named tree-ish (most often a commit-ish)
instead of switching branches.
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
+filter_refs(array, FILTER_REFS_ALL | FILTER_REFS_INCLUDE_BROKEN,
filter);
I think it is more common to have options at the end, so I'd write it as
filter_refs(array, filter, FILTER_REFS_ALL
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/2015 11:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
What change since 9f613dd do you have in mind, exactly, though?
Well initially the atoms were indexed into used_atom array,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:00:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Fetched that branch, built and found out that it does not pass the
tests, at least these (there may be others I do not usually run that
are broken by this series; I dunno), so I'll discard what I fetched
for now X-.
Test
Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com writes:
+ if (get_git_namespace() !symref.items) {
+ die(git upload-pack: tried to clone from empty namespace);
+ }
Is this sufficient?
get_git_namespace() returns environment.c::namespace, which is set
up in setup_git_env() by
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
I think it is needed later when struct ref_sort is moved into
ref-filter.h, because then the used_atom[] array is not moved.
Now I am confused. used_atom[] is the
Mike Rappazzo rappa...@gmail.com writes:
In the second loop, I changed it to recalculate the presented message
when the re-ordered commit is added:
+ if test -n ${format}
+ then
+msg_content=$(git log -n 1 --format=${format} ${squash})
That is the $rest.
Ahh,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com writes:
/**
+ * Appends merge candidates from FETCH_HEAD that are not marked
not-for-merge
+ * into merge_heads.
+ */
Hmph, I vaguely recall doing that in C elsewhere already, even
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Panagiotis Astithas past...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Panagiotis Astithas past...@gmail.com
wrote:
The output of pmset -g batt changed at some point from
Junio C Hamano gitster at pobox.com writes:
Hmmm, I do not seem to be able to do this, though.
$ ln -s $HOME/g/share/git-core/templates /var/tmp/git-template
$ cd /var/tmp
$ git init --template=/var/tmp/git-template new
$ find new/.git -type l
...
Alex Cornejo acorn...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gitster at pobox.com writes:
Hmmm, I do not seem to be able to do this, though.
$ ln -s $HOME/g/share/git-core/templates /var/tmp/git-template
$ cd /var/tmp
$ git init --template=/var/tmp/git-template new
Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net writes:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:05:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
How about this?
'git checkout' with paths or `--patch` is used to restore
modified or deleted paths to their original contents from
the index file or from a
The test expects that chmod -r ~/.git-credentials would make it
unreadable to the user, and thus needs the SANITY prerequisite.
Reported-by: Jean-Yves LENHOF jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com
---
t/t0302-credential-store.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
On vr, 2015-06-12 at 13:26 +0200, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
AFAIU git stores the contents of a repo as a sequence of patches in the
.git metadata folder.
It does not, it stores full snapshots of files.
[I've cut the example, as it's not how git works]
1. `git clone --depth 1` would be
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:29:58PM +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
The test expects that chmod -r ~/.git-credentials would make it
unreadable to the user, and thus needs the SANITY prerequisite.
Yup, looks obviously correct to me. Thanks for a quick turnaround.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Panagiotis Astithas past...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Panagiotis Astithas past...@gmail.com
wrote:
The output of pmset -g batt changed at some point from
Currently drawing from 'AC
Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes:
What is the problem with the current fetch-pack implementation? Does
it remove a bogus packfile after download? Does it abort during
download when it detects a broken packfile? Does --keep not do what
you need?
Doesn't the incoming data still go through
Alex Cornejo acorn...@gmail.com writes:
I was surprised to see that when using git-init, if the template folder
is itself a symlink, then the contents of the template is NOT copied to
the resulting git repository, but instead each individual file is
symlinked.
Hmmm, I do not seem to be able
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
The comment in 'ref_sort' hasn't been changed 9f613dd.
Bad grammar? hasn't been changed since 9f613dd, perhaps?
But more importantly, don't just give an abbreviated object name. I
think the comment hasn't changed since the for-each-ref command was
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
What is the problem with the current fetch-pack implementation? Does
it remove a bogus packfile after download? Does it abort during
download when it detects a broken packfile? Does --keep not do what
you need?
Doesn't
On 06/12/2015 11:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
Extract two helper functions out of grab_single_ref(). Firstly,
new_refinfo() which is used to allocate memory for a new refinfo
structure and copy the objectname, refname and flag to it.
Secondly,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org wrote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Augie Fackler:
When developing server software, it's often helpful to save a
potentially-bogus pack for later analysis. This makes that trivial,
instead of painful.
When you develop server
I did something stupid like trying to push a copy of WebKit[1] into my
GitHub account. This is ~5.2 GiB of data, which GitHub prefers not to
accept. Ok ...
$ git push --all g...@github.com:spearce/wk.git
Counting objects: 2752427, done.
Delta compression using up to 12 threads.
Compressing
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
Extract two helper functions out of grab_single_ref(). Firstly,
new_refinfo() which is used to allocate memory for a new refinfo
structure and copy the objectname, refname and flag to it.
Secondly, match_name_as_path() which when given an array of
On 06/12/2015 11:10 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
The comment in 'ref_sort' hasn't been changed 9f613dd.
Bad grammar? hasn't been changed since 9f613dd, perhaps?
Yes! thanks :)
But more importantly, don't just give an abbreviated object name. I
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
I did something stupid like trying to push a copy of WebKit[1] into my
GitHub account. This is ~5.2 GiB of data, which GitHub prefers not to
accept. Ok ...
...
Shouldn't git push realize its stream is broken and stop writing when
the peer is all like
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 08:07:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes:
What is the problem with the current fetch-pack implementation? Does
it remove a bogus packfile after download? Does it abort during
download when it detects a broken packfile? Does --keep
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:31:33AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
I did something stupid like trying to push a copy of WebKit[1] into my
GitHub account. This is ~5.2 GiB of data, which GitHub prefers not to
accept. Ok ...
Heh, yeah. We cap it at 2G, and if you are going to have a WebKit fork,
we
On 06/12/2015 11:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
What change since 9f613dd do you have in mind, exactly, though?
Well initially the atoms were indexed into used_atom array, which
later was removed. Hence the comment becomes obsolete.
Later in which
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
What change since 9f613dd do you have in mind, exactly, though?
Well initially the atoms were indexed into used_atom array, which
later was removed. Hence the comment becomes obsolete.
Later in which commit? In builtin/for-each-ref.c in the
The term index is translated as Staging-Area to
match a majority of German books and to not confuse
Git beginners who don't know about Git's index.
Staging Area is used in German books as a thing where
content can be staged for commit. While the translation
is good for those kind of messages,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:12:56PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
$ git push --all g...@github.com:spearce/wk.git
Counting objects: 2752427, done.
Delta compression using up to 12 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (442684/442684), done.
remote: fatal: pack exceeds maximum allowed size
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:17:40PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Philippe De Muyter p...@macq.eu writes:
I am bisecting the kernel tree between v3.17 and v3.18, and 'git describe'
is used by the kernel compilation process. Why do I get a version
v3.17-rc7-1626-ga4b4a2b, that seems outside
70 matches
Mail list logo
