Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Forney writes: >> On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> Have you made sure that all of these scripts, before calling >>> 'git-foo' in the current code, update their PATH so that these found >>>

Re: reftable [v5]: new ref storage format

5th iteration of the reftable storage format. You can read a rendered version of this here: https://googlers.googlesource.com/sop/jgit/+/reftable/Documentation/technical/reftable.md Significant changes from v4: - Supported Michael Haggerty's multi-level index. - Restart table now appears at

Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

Michael Forney writes: > On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Have you made sure that all of these scripts, before calling >> 'git-foo' in the current code, update their PATH so that these found >> in the bog standard place (i.e. GIT_EXEC_PATH)? >> >> The

Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

Hi Junio, On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Forney writes: > > > This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't > > installed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney > > --- > > It looks like there was an effort to do

[ANNOUNCE] Git for Windows 2.14.0

Dear Git users, It is my pleasure to announce that Git for Windows 2.14.0 is available from: https://git-for-windows.github.io/ Changes since Git for Windows v2.13.3 (July 13th 2017) New Features * Comes with Git v2.14.0. * Comes with [BusyBox

Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Have you made sure that all of these scripts, before calling > 'git-foo' in the current code, update their PATH so that these found > in the bog standard place (i.e. GIT_EXEC_PATH)? > > The reason I ask is because we can rest assured these

Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

Michael Forney writes: > This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't > installed. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney > --- > It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through > `make remove-dashes`). These are

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2017, #09; Mon, 31)

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > We've talked how this UX should look before on-list. Rather than > re-hashing the arguments I had before I thought it was useful to present > it as a table. Here's how the patch looks now: > > >

Re: [PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

Hi Michael, On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Michael Forney wrote: > This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't > installed. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney > --- > It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through > `make

Re: reftable [v4]: new ref storage format

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Shawn Pearce wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Michael Haggerty >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Shawn Pearce

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2017, #09; Mon, 31)

On Thu, Aug 03 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted: > Sahil Dua writes: > >> Ah! I had skipped this reply from Ramsay earlier. >> >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Ramsay Jones >> ... I personally do not think "branch --copy master backup" while on "master" that

bug: git stash list --format='%gd' --date=format:'…'

Synopsis: When expanding '%gd' placeholder (reflog selector), git substitutes user-specified --date format, which mangles the reflog. Description: I was writing a script that expects a stash reflog and a date on stdin: % git stash list --format='%gd%n%ad' stash@{0} Sat Aug 5

Re: [GSoC][PATCH 08/13] submodule: port submodule subcommand 'summary' from shell to C

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Christian Couder wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Christian Couder >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:56 PM,

Re: [GSoC][PATCH 08/13] submodule: port submodule subcommand 'summary' from shell to C

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Christian Couder > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Prathamesh Chavan >> wrote: >> > We can avoid it to behave same for ""

Assalamu`Alaikum.

Greetings from Dr. mohammad ouattara. Assalamu`Alaikum. My Name is Dr. mohammad ouattara, I am a banker by profession. I'm from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, West Africa. My reason for contacting you is to transfer an abandoned $14.6M to your account. The owner of this fund died since 2004

Re: [GSoC][PATCH 08/13] submodule: port submodule subcommand 'summary' from shell to C

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Christian Couder wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: > >> * variable head was no longer used in module_summary() and instead the strbuf >> was utilized. > > Good but there might be a

Hello Beautiful,

Good day dear, i hope this mail meets you well? my name is Jack, from the U.S. I know this may seem inappropriate so i ask for your forgiveness but i wish to get to know you better, if I may be so bold. I consider myself an easy-going man, adventurous, honest and fun loving person but I am

[PATCH] Drop some dashes from built-in invocations in scripts

This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't installed. Signed-off-by: Michael Forney --- It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through `make remove-dashes`). These are just a few I noticed were still left in the .sh scripts.